• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自体血和皮质类固醇注射及体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎

Autologous blood and corticosteroid injection and extracoporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

作者信息

Ozturan Kutay E, Yucel Istemi, Cakici Husamettin, Guven Melih, Sungur Ibrahim

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2010 Feb;33(2):84-91. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100104-09.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20100104-09
PMID:20192142
Abstract

Lateral epicondylitis is a common disorder characterized by pain and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle. It occurs most frequently as a result of minor, unrecognized trauma during sports activities and occupation-related physical activities. The goal of this study was to evaluate the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of corticosteroid injection, autologous blood injection, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.Sixty patients (32 women, 28 men) with lateral epicondylitis were randomly divided into 3 groups: group 1 received a corticosteroid injection; group 2, an autologous blood injection, and group 3, extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Thomsen provocative testing, upper extremity functional scores, and maximal grip strength were used for evaluation. Outcomes were assessed at 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Corticosteroid injection gave significantly better results for all outcome measures at 4 weeks; success rates in the 3 groups were 90%, 16.6%, and 42.1%, respectively. Autologous blood injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy gave significantly better Thomsen provocative test results and upper extremity functional scores at 52 weeks; the success rate of corticosteroid injection was 50%, which was significantly lower than the success rates for autologous blood injection (83.3%) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (89.9%). Corticosteroid injection provided a high success rate in the short term. However, autologous blood injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy gave better long-term results, especially considering the high recurrence rate with corticosteroid injection. We suggest that the treatment of choice for lateral epicondylitis be autologous blood injection.

摘要

肱骨外上髁炎是一种常见疾病,其特征为肱骨外上髁处疼痛和压痛。它最常因体育活动和职业相关体力活动中轻微、未被察觉的创伤而发生。本研究的目的是评估皮质类固醇注射、自体血注射和体外冲击波疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的短期、中期和长期效果。60例肱骨外上髁炎患者(32例女性,28例男性)被随机分为3组:第1组接受皮质类固醇注射;第2组接受自体血注射;第3组接受体外冲击波疗法。采用汤姆森激发试验、上肢功能评分和最大握力进行评估。在4周、12周、26周和52周时评估结果。在4周时,皮质类固醇注射在所有结果指标上均取得了明显更好的效果;3组的成功率分别为90%、16.6%和42.1%。在52周时,自体血注射和体外冲击波疗法在汤姆森激发试验结果和上肢功能评分方面明显更好;皮质类固醇注射的成功率为50%,显著低于自体血注射(83.3%)和体外冲击波疗法(89.9%)的成功率。皮质类固醇注射在短期内成功率较高。然而,自体血注射和体外冲击波疗法的长期效果更好,尤其是考虑到皮质类固醇注射的高复发率。我们建议肱骨外上髁炎的首选治疗方法是自体血注射。

相似文献

1
Autologous blood and corticosteroid injection and extracoporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.自体血和皮质类固醇注射及体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎
Orthopedics. 2010 Feb;33(2):84-91. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100104-09.
2
Comparison of autologous blood, corticosteroid, and saline injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study.自体血、皮质类固醇和生理盐水注射治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Aug;36(8):1269-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
3
Autologous blood injections for refractory lateral epicondylitis.自体血注射治疗难治性外侧上髁炎。
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Mar;28(2):272-8. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50041.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis--a double blind randomised controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗外侧上髁炎——一项双盲随机对照试验
J Orthop Res. 2002 Sep;20(5):895-8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X.
5
A randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow).体外冲击波治疗外侧上髁炎(网球肘)的随机对照试验
J Rheumatol. 2008 Oct;35(10):2038-46. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
6
Corticosteroid or placebo injection combined with deep transverse friction massage, Mills manipulation, stretching and eccentric exercise for acute lateral epicondylitis: a randomised, controlled trial.皮质类固醇或安慰剂注射联合深层横向摩擦按摩、米尔斯手法、拉伸及离心运动治疗急性外侧上髁炎:一项随机对照试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 May 20;16:122. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0582-6.
7
[Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis].[体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎患者]
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(3):207-10.
8
Positive effect of an autologous platelet concentrate in lateral epicondylitis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial: platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection with a 1-year follow-up.自体血小板浓缩物在外侧肱骨上髁炎中的双盲随机对照试验中的积极作用:富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射的 1 年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):255-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546509355445.
9
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of previously untreated lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗初发性外侧肱骨髁炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Oct-Nov;32(7):1660-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546503262806.
10
[Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in epicondylitis humeri ulnaris or radialis--a prospective, controlled, comparative study].[体外冲击波疗法治疗尺侧或桡侧肱骨外上髁炎——一项前瞻性、对照、比较研究]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1998 Jan-Feb;136(1):3-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1044642.

引用本文的文献

1
[Short and long-term effectiveness of corticosterorid injections in osteoarticular pathology. Two-year Prospective Study].[皮质类固醇注射治疗骨关节疾病的短期和长期疗效。两年前瞻性研究]
Aten Primaria. 2025 Mar 12;57(9):103250. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103250.
2
High Versus Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Retrospective Study.高能量与低能量体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎:一项回顾性研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Sep 22;9(3):173. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9030173.
3
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection for Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
体外冲击波疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2598-2607. doi: 10.1111/os.14212. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
Lateral elbow magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients without pain complaints.无疼痛主诉患者的肘部外侧磁共振成像结果
JPRAS Open. 2024 Jun 12;41:159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.06.005. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Comparing autologous blood, corticosteroid, and a combined injection of both for treating lateral epicondylitis: a randomized clinical trial.比较自体血、皮质类固醇和两者联合注射治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎:一项随机临床试验。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jul 4;25(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00772-4.
6
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Narrative Review.用于治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的体外冲击波疗法:一项叙述性综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;11(21):2830. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212830.
7
Comparison of the Clinical Results of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Steroid and Autologous Blood Injections in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis.富血小板血浆、类固醇和自体血注射治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的临床结果比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;11(5):767. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050767.
8
Effects of splinting and three injection therapies (corticosteroid, autologous blood and prolotherapy) on pain, grip strength, and functionality in patients with lateral epicondylitis.夹板固定及三种注射疗法(皮质类固醇、自体血和注射用增殖疗法)对肱骨外上髁炎患者疼痛、握力及功能的影响。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 1;68(2):205-213. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8007. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Clinical efficacy of local injection therapies for lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.外侧上髁炎局部注射疗法的临床疗效:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Caspian J Intern Med. 2022 Spring;13(2):311-325. doi: 10.22088/cjim.13.2.1.
10
Multiple Perforations of the ECRB Tendon Using an Innovative Standardized, Reproducible Technique; A Cadaveric Study on Accuracy and Prospective Clinical Safety Assessment Pilot Study. No Adverse Effects in the First 122 Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis.使用创新的标准化、可重复技术对桡侧腕短伸肌肌腱进行多处穿孔;一项关于准确性和前瞻性临床安全性评估的尸体研究及初步研究。对122例肱骨外上髁炎患者未产生不良反应。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 May;10(5):413-419. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.48405.2396.