Institution of Odontology, Dental School Umeå, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress has been considered as one of the main disadvantages of resin composite restorations. Cavities with high C-factors increase the risk for interfacial failures. Several restorative techniques have been suggested to decrease the shrinkage stress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of techniques as oblique layering, indirect curing and/or a laminate with a poly-acid modified resin composite in direct Class I resin composite restorations in a 12-year follow-up.
Each of 29 patients received one or two pair(s) rather extensive Class I restorations. The first restoration was a poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite sandwich restoration and the second a direct resin composite restoration. Both restorations, except for the laminate layer, were placed with oblique layering and two-step curing technique. 90 restorations were evaluated annually with slightly modified USPHS criteria during 12 years.
At 12 years, 38 pairs were evaluated. Two cases of slight post-operative sensitivity were observed in one patient. A cumulative failure rate of 2.4% was observed for both the resin composite and the laminate restorations. One laminate restoration showed non-acceptable color match, but was not replaced and one resin composite restoration showed a chip fracture. Five restorations were replaced due to primary proximal caries.
The high failure rate expected in the high C-factor Class I cavity, associated with polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress, were not observed. The techniques used resulted in an excellent durability for the Class I resin composite restorations.
聚合收缩和收缩应力被认为是树脂复合材料修复体的主要缺点之一。高 C 因素的腔增加了界面失效的风险。已经提出了几种修复技术来降低收缩应力。本研究的目的是在 12 年的随访中,评估斜分层、间接固化和/或用聚酸改性树脂复合材料制成的层压板等技术在直接 I 类树脂复合材料修复体中的耐用性。
每个患者接受一个或两个对(或更多)广泛的 I 类修复体。第一个修复体是聚酸改性树脂复合材料/树脂复合材料夹层修复体,第二个是直接树脂复合材料修复体。除层压板外,两种修复体均采用斜分层和两步固化技术进行放置。在 12 年内,每年用略修改的 USPHS 标准对 90 个修复体进行评估。
12 年后,对 38 对进行了评估。一名患者有两例轻微术后敏感的情况。树脂复合材料和层压板修复体的累积失败率均为 2.4%。一个层压板修复体显示出不可接受的颜色匹配,但未被更换,一个树脂复合材料修复体显示出芯片断裂。由于原发性近中龋齿,有 5 个修复体被更换。
在高 C 因素的 I 类腔中,聚合收缩和收缩应力导致的高失败率并未观察到。所使用的技术使 I 类树脂复合材料修复体具有出色的耐用性。