von Gehren Marie O, Rüttermann Stefan, Romanos Georgios E, Herrmann Eva, Gerhardt-Szép Susanne
Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School (Carolinum), Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, 106 Rockland Hall, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8700, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;11(3):69. doi: 10.3390/dj11030069.
The purpose of this observational follow-up clinical study was to observe the quality of posterior composite restorations more than 23 years after application. A total of 22 patients, 13 male and 9 female (mean age 66.1 years, range 50-84), with a total of 42 restorations attended the first and second follow-up examinations. The restorations were examined by one operator using modified FDI criteria. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon exact matched-pairs test with a significance level of = 0.05. Bonferroni-Holm with an adjusted significance level of alpha = 0.05 was applied. With the exception of approximal anatomical form, significantly worse scores were seen for six out of seven criteria at the second follow-up evaluation. There was no significant difference in the first and second follow-up evaluations in the grades of the restorations with regard to having been placed in the maxilla or mandible, as well as for one-surface or multiple-surface restorations. The approximal anatomical form showed significantly worse grades at the second follow-up when having been placed in molars. In conclusion, the study results show that significant differences regarding FDI criteria in posterior composite restorations occur after more than 23 years of service. Further studies with extended follow-up time and at regular and short time intervals are recommended.
这项观察性随访临床研究的目的是观察复合树脂后牙修复体应用23年以上的质量。共有22例患者(13例男性,9例女性,平均年龄66.1岁,年龄范围50 - 84岁),共42颗修复体接受了首次和第二次随访检查。由一名操作人员使用改良的FDI标准对修复体进行检查。采用Wilcoxon Mann - Whitney U检验和Wilcoxon精确配对检验进行统计分析,显著性水平α = 0.05。应用调整显著性水平α = 0.05的Bonferroni - Holm法。除邻面解剖形态外,在第二次随访评估中,七个标准中的六个标准得分显著更差。在第一次和第二次随访评估中,修复体在上颌或下颌的放置情况以及单面或多面修复体的等级方面没有显著差异。当放置在磨牙中时,邻面解剖形态在第二次随访时显示出显著更差的等级。总之,研究结果表明,复合树脂后牙修复体在使用23年以上后,在FDI标准方面出现了显著差异。建议进行随访时间更长且定期短时间间隔的进一步研究。