Policy: EPA's ground-level ozone standard redux.
作者信息
Weinhold Bob
出版信息
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Mar;118(3):A 115. doi: 10.1289/ehp.118-a115.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Policy: EPA's ground-level ozone standard redux.
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Mar;118(3):A 115. doi: 10.1289/ehp.118-a115.
2
EPA's New Ozone Air Quality Standard: Why Should We Care?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Nov;14(11):1627-1629. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-557EH.
3
A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards.
Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Apr;105(4):378-83. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105378.
4
Atmospheric Science. China blamed for U.S. ozone.
Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1233. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6202.1233.
5
Car emissions are EPA's problem.
Nature. 2007 Apr 5;446(7136):589. doi: 10.1038/446589a.
6
The sustained undermining of science by the EPA's leaders is a travesty.
Nature. 2020 May;581(7806):7-8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01310-y.
7
EPA: airing on the side of caution or pulling standards out of thin Air?
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Apr;108(4):A176-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-a176.
8
Hazy reasoning behind clean air.
Nature. 2008 Apr 3;452(7187):519. doi: 10.1038/452519a.
9
Silenced science: air pollution decision-making at the EPA threatens public health.
New Solut. 2007;17(1-2):13-6. doi: 10.2190/V541-6531-2614-0375.
10
A second chance. Setting a protective ozone standard.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb 15;181(4):297-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0032ED.
Zotero 插件