McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Circulation. 2010 Mar 16;121(10):1176-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.881003. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Rosiglitazone has several properties that may affect progression of atherosclerosis. The Assessment on the Prevention of Progression by Rosiglitazone on Atherosclerosis in Diabetes Patients With Cardiovascular History (APPROACH) study was undertaken to determine the effect of the thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone on coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by intravascular ultrasound compared with the sulfonylurea glipizide.
This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled 18-month study in 672 patients aged 30 to 80 years with established type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by lifestyle, 1 oral agent, or submaximal doses of 2 oral agents who had at least 1 atherosclerotic plaque with 10% to 50% luminal narrowing in a coronary artery that had not undergone intervention during a clinically indicated coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was change in percent atheroma volume in the longest and least angulated epicardial coronary artery that had not undergone intervention. Secondary outcomes included change in normalized total atheroma volume and change in total atheroma volume in the most diseased baseline 10-mm segment. Rosiglitazone did not significantly reduce the primary outcome of percent atheroma volume compared with glipizide (-0.64%; 95% confidence interval, -1.46 to 0.17; P=0.12). The secondary outcome of normalized total atheroma volume was significantly reduced by rosiglitazone compared with glipizide (-5.1 mm(3); 95% confidence interval, -10.0 to -0.3; P=0.04); however, no significant difference between groups was observed for the change in total atheroma volume within the most diseased baseline 10-mm segment (-1.7 mm(3); 95% confidence interval, -3.9 to 0.5; P=0.13).
Rosiglitazone did not significantly decrease the primary end point of progression of coronary atherosclerosis more than glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary atherosclerosis. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00116831.
罗格列酮具有多种特性,可能影响动脉粥样硬化的进展。有鉴于此,我们开展了这项名为“在有心血管病史的糖尿病患者中,评估罗格列酮对动脉粥样硬化进展的预防作用(APPROACH)”的研究,旨在通过血管内超声评估噻唑烷二酮类药物罗格列酮对冠状动脉粥样硬化的影响,并与磺酰脲类药物格列吡嗪进行比较。
这是一项在 672 例年龄 30 至 80 岁、确诊为 2 型糖尿病且接受生活方式、1 种口服药物或 2 种口服药物最大剂量治疗的患者中开展的随机、双盲、对照研究,这些患者在接受临床指征明确的冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之前,其至少 1 支冠状动脉内已经存在至少 1 处 10%至 50%管腔狭窄的动脉粥样硬化斑块。主要终点为未经介入治疗的最长、最非成角的心外膜冠状动脉内粥样斑块体积百分比变化。次要终点包括校正总粥样斑块体积的变化和基线时最严重的 10mm 节段内总粥样斑块体积的变化。与格列吡嗪相比,罗格列酮并未显著降低动脉粥样斑块体积百分比这一主要终点(-0.64%;95%置信区间,-1.46 至 0.17;P=0.12)。与格列吡嗪相比,罗格列酮显著降低校正总粥样斑块体积的次要终点(-5.1mm3;95%置信区间,-10.0 至 -0.3;P=0.04);然而,两组间最严重的基线 10mm 节段内总粥样斑块体积变化的差异无统计学意义(-1.7mm3;95%置信区间,-3.9 至 0.5;P=0.13)。
在患有 2 型糖尿病和冠状动脉粥样硬化的患者中,罗格列酮并未显著降低冠状动脉粥样硬化进展这一首要终点,其疗效并不优于格列吡嗪。临床试验注册:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。识别号:NCT00116831。