钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂治疗 2 型糖尿病:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
机构信息
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
出版信息
BMJ. 2021 Jan 13;372:m4573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4573.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying cardiovascular and renal risk.
DESIGN
Network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 11 August 2020.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Randomised controlled trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with placebo, standard care, or other glucose lowering treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes with follow up of 24 weeks or longer. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was carried out and GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) used to assess evidence certainty. Results included estimated absolute effects of treatment per 1000 patients treated for five years for patients at very low risk (no cardiovascular risk factors), low risk (three or more cardiovascular risk factors), moderate risk (cardiovascular disease), high risk (chronic kidney disease), and very high risk (cardiovascular disease and kidney disease). A guideline panel provided oversight of the systematic review.
RESULTS
764 trials including 421 346 patients proved eligible. All results refer to the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing diabetes treatment. Both classes of drugs lowered all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and kidney failure (high certainty evidence). Notable differences were found between the two agents: SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced admission to hospital for heart failure more than GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced non-fatal stroke more than SGLT-2 inhibitors (which appeared to have no effect). SGLT-2 inhibitors caused genital infection (high certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists might cause severe gastrointestinal events (low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists might lower body weight. Little or no evidence was found for the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists on limb amputation, blindness, eye disease, neuropathic pain, or health related quality of life. The absolute benefits of these drugs vary substantially across patients from low to very high risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes (eg, SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in 3 to 40 fewer deaths in 1000 patients over five years; see interactive decision support tool (https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!/) for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with some differences in benefits and harms. Absolute benefits are determined by individual risk profiles of patients, with clear implications for clinical practice, as reflected in the BMJ Rapid Recommendations directly informed by this systematic review.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019153180.
目的
评估钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂在不同心血管和肾脏风险的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效。
设计
网络荟萃分析。
资料来源
截至 2020 年 8 月 11 日,Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。
入选研究的标准
比较 SGLT-2 抑制剂或 GLP-1 受体激动剂与安慰剂、标准治疗或其他降糖治疗在 24 周或更长时间随访的 2 型糖尿病成人患者中的随机对照试验。两名评审员独立筛选研究的合格性、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。
主要结局测量
进行了有频率的随机效应网络荟萃分析,并使用 GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评估分级)评估证据确定性。结果包括每 1000 例患者治疗 5 年的绝对治疗效果,患者的风险非常低(无心血管危险因素)、低风险(有 3 个或更多心血管危险因素)、中风险(心血管疾病)、高风险(慢性肾脏病)和非常高风险(心血管疾病和肾脏病)。一个指南小组对系统评价进行了监督。
结果
764 项试验共纳入 421346 例患者,证明符合入选标准。所有结果均指在现有糖尿病治疗的基础上添加 SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂。两类药物均降低全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死和肾衰竭(高确定性证据)。两种药物之间存在明显差异:SGLT-2 抑制剂降低心力衰竭住院治疗的效果优于 GLP-1 受体激动剂,而 GLP-1 受体激动剂降低非致死性卒中的效果优于 SGLT-2 抑制剂(后者似乎没有效果)。SGLT-2 抑制剂导致生殖器感染(高确定性),而 GLP-1 受体激动剂可能导致严重的胃肠道事件(低确定性)。低确定性证据表明,SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂可能降低体重。在心血管和肾脏结局的低至非常高风险的患者中,SGLT-2 抑制剂或 GLP-1 受体激动剂对截肢、失明、眼病、神经痛或健康相关生活质量的影响证据很少或没有。这些药物的绝对益处因患者的心血管和肾脏风险状况而异(例如,在 5 年期间,SGLT-2 抑制剂使每 1000 例患者减少 3 至 40 例死亡;有关所有结果,请参见交互式决策支持工具(https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!//))。
结论
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂降低了心血管和肾脏结局,在获益和危害方面存在一些差异。绝对获益取决于患者的个体风险状况,这对临床实践有明确的影响,这反映在本系统评价直接提供的 BMJ 快速推荐中。
系统评价注册
PROSPERO CRD42019153180。