证据与影响：这些文章是否应改变脊柱护理的实践？一个循证医学过程。 - Suppr | 超能文献

相似文献

1

Evidence and impact: should these articles change the practice of spine care? An evidence-based medicine process.证据与影响：这些文章是否应改变脊柱护理的实践？一个循证医学过程。

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 15;35(6):E176-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d938df.

2

Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance?脊柱期刊：审稿人对出版建议的意见一致性是否大于偶然情况下的预期？

Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):209-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.12.003.

3

Peer review: should we modify our process?同行评审：我们应该修改我们的流程吗？

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):463-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12415.

4

The biopsychosocial approach to spine care and research.脊柱护理与研究的生物心理社会方法。

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2572. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00005.

5

Peer review and the nursing literature.同行评审与护理文献

Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):73. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31819f1589.

6

Grades of recommendation.推荐等级。

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1909-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.8709.edit.

7

State of literature in foot and ankle.足踝部文献综述

Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Nov;31(11):1039-40.

8

Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?研究人员、作者和审稿人：我们的职责是什么？

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26(4):308-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01306.x. Epub 2012 May 20.

9

The ARRIVE guidelines: a resource for authors and reviewers to ensure that submissions to The Veterinary Journal meet minimal expectations of completeness, accuracy and transparency.《ARRIVE指南》：供作者和审稿人参考的资源，以确保向《兽医杂志》提交的稿件达到完整性、准确性和透明度的最低要求。

Vet J. 2011 Sep;189(3):237-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.07.008.

10

Journals lack explicit policies for separating eds from ads.期刊缺乏将编辑内容与广告区分开来的明确政策。

Nature. 2005 Mar 31;434(7033):549. doi: 10.1038/434549a.