The Center for the Study of Society, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel.
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;150(1):57-76. doi: 10.1080/00224540903232290.
In this study, I explored intended response to aggression among adolescents. I drew hypotheses from social identity theory, cost/benefit considerations, and social information processing model. I asked 217 Jewish and Muslim male adolescents in this study to assess their intended use of aggression in 12 hypothetical conflict situations (vignettes), in which I manipulated the opponent's religion, gender, acquaintance, and severity of aggression. I mainly found that male adolescents respond to aggression by same-religion opponents more moderately than to cross-religion aggression; their response is more moderate to cross-gender aggression than to same-gender aggression; response is more moderate to the aggression of familiar opponents than to that of unfamiliar ones; and response is less severe toward moderate than toward severe aggression.
在这项研究中，我探讨了青少年的预期攻击反应。我从社会认同理论、成本/收益考虑以及社会信息处理模型中提出了假设。我要求研究中的 217 名犹太和穆斯林男性青少年评估他们在 12 种假设冲突情境（情景）中使用攻击的意图，我在这些情境中操纵了对手的宗教、性别、相识程度和攻击的严重程度。我主要发现，男青少年对来自同一宗教的对手的攻击反应比对跨宗教攻击的反应更温和；他们对跨性别攻击的反应比对同性别攻击的反应更温和；对熟悉对手的攻击反应比对不熟悉对手的攻击反应更温和；对温和的攻击比严重的攻击反应更不激烈。
