Suppr超能文献

成年 2 型糖尿病患者在基础胰岛素治疗基础上随机加用餐时普兰林肽或速效胰岛素类似物的患者报告结局。

Patient reported outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin randomized to addition of mealtime pramlintide or rapid-acting insulin analogs.

机构信息

Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 May;26(5):1047-54. doi: 10.1185/03007991003634759.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether treatment satisfaction and quality of life were affected by adding mealtime pramlintide or rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAIAs) to basal insulin therapy for patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this 24-week open-label, multicenter study of adults with type 2 diabetes, mealtime pramlintide (PRAM) (120 microg fixed dose; n = 56) or titrated RAIAs (n = 56) was added to basal insulin therapy with or without oral antidiabetic medications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00467649.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality of life (Diabetes Distress Scale - DDS, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - PSQI), and treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - DTSQ, and Pramlintide Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - PRAM-TSQ) were assessed at baseline and week 24. Mixed-effect models estimated mean group changes from baseline to week 24 (adjusted for baseline scores) in patient reported outcomes.

RESULTS

PRAM patients experienced significant improvement in total diabetes distress, while RAIA patients did not; both groups experienced significant improvement in regimen-related distress and physician-related distress. Between-group differences in DDS measures were not significant. PRAM patients experienced significant improvement in sleep latency and daytime dysfunction, while RAIA patients did not; the difference between groups was significant for daytime dysfunction. Both treatment groups experienced significant improvement in most individual DTSQ items and total diabetes treatment satisfaction, while only PRAM patients experienced significant improvement in perceived hypoglycemia. Between-group differences in DTSQ measures were not significant. Both treatment groups experienced significant improvement in most individual PRAM-TSQ items and total treatment satisfaction; RAIA patients experienced increased eating flexibility and reduced perceived weight control. PRAM patients experienced significantly better perceived weight and appetite control than RAIA patients.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size was relatively small and there were few non-white subjects. The schedule for implementation of change in therapy may have affected study outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding pramlintide on a background of basal insulin improved some aspects of treatment satisfaction and quality of life relative to adding rapid-acting insulin analogs.

摘要

目的

确定对于血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者,在用基础胰岛素治疗的基础上添加餐时普兰林肽或速效胰岛素类似物(RAIA)是否会影响治疗满意度和生活质量。

研究设计和方法

在这项为期 24 周、开放标签、多中心的 2 型糖尿病成人研究中,对于接受基础胰岛素治疗的患者,无论是否同时接受口服降糖药物治疗,均添加固定剂量的餐时普兰林肽(PRAM)(120μg;n=56)或滴定后的 RAIA(n=56)。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00467649。

主要观察指标

在基线和 24 周时评估生活质量(糖尿病困扰量表-DDS 和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数-PSQI)和治疗满意度(糖尿病治疗满意度问卷-DTSQ 和普兰林肽治疗满意度问卷-PRAM-TSQ)。混合效应模型估计了从基线到 24 周时患者报告结果的平均组间变化(根据基线评分进行调整)。

结果

PRAM 组患者的总体糖尿病困扰显著改善,而 RAIA 组患者则没有;两组患者的治疗方案相关困扰和与医生相关的困扰均显著改善。DDS 测量的组间差异无统计学意义。PRAM 组患者的入睡潜伏期和日间功能障碍显著改善,而 RAIA 组患者则没有;日间功能障碍的组间差异具有统计学意义。两组治疗组在大多数 DTSQ 单项和总体糖尿病治疗满意度方面均显著改善,而仅 PRAM 组患者在感知性低血糖方面显著改善。DTSQ 测量的组间差异无统计学意义。两组治疗组在大多数 PRAM-TSQ 单项和总体治疗满意度方面均显著改善;RAIA 组患者的饮食灵活性增加,感知体重控制减轻。PRAM 组患者在感知体重和食欲控制方面明显优于 RAIA 组患者。

局限性

样本量相对较小,且非白人受试者较少。治疗方案改变的实施时间表可能会影响研究结果。

结论

在基础胰岛素治疗的基础上添加普兰林肽相对于添加速效胰岛素类似物可改善某些方面的治疗满意度和生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验