Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.
Both dopamine and norepinephrine are recommended as first-line vasopressor agents in the treatment of shock. There is a continuing controversy about whether one agent is superior to the other.
In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with shock to receive either dopamine or norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor therapy to restore and maintain blood pressure. When blood pressure could not be maintained with a dose of 20 microg per kilogram of body weight per minute for dopamine or a dose of 0.19 microg per kilogram per minute for norepinephrine, open-label norepinephrine, epinephrine, or vasopressin could be added. The primary outcome was the rate of death at 28 days after randomization; secondary end points included the number of days without need for organ support and the occurrence of adverse events.
The trial included 1679 patients, of whom 858 were assigned to dopamine and 821 to norepinephrine. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death at 28 days (52.5% in the dopamine group and 48.5% in the norepinephrine group; odds ratio with dopamine, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.42; P=0.10). However, there were more arrhythmic events among the patients treated with dopamine than among those treated with norepinephrine (207 events [24.1%] vs. 102 events [12.4%], P<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed that dopamine, as compared with norepinephrine, was associated with an increased rate of death at 28 days among the 280 patients with cardiogenic shock but not among the 1044 patients with septic shock or the 263 with hypovolemic shock (P=0.03 for cardiogenic shock, P=0.19 for septic shock, and P=0.84 for hypovolemic shock, in Kaplan-Meier analyses).
Although there was no significant difference in the rate of death between patients with shock who were treated with dopamine as the first-line vasopressor agent and those who were treated with norepinephrine, the use of dopamine was associated with a greater number of adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00314704.)
多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素均被推荐作为休克治疗的一线升压药。一种药物是否优于另一种药物仍存在争议。
在这项多中心、随机试验中,我们将休克患者分配至接受多巴胺或去甲肾上腺素作为一线升压治疗药物,以恢复和维持血压。当多巴胺剂量达到 20μg/kg/分钟仍无法维持血压,或去甲肾上腺素剂量达到 0.19μg/kg/分钟仍无法维持血压时,可以加用去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素或血管加压素。主要结局为随机分组后 28 天的死亡率;次要终点包括无需器官支持的天数和不良事件的发生情况。
试验共纳入 1679 例患者,其中 858 例分配至多巴胺组,821 例分配至去甲肾上腺素组。两组的基线特征相似。28 天死亡率无显著组间差异(多巴胺组为 52.5%,去甲肾上腺素组为 48.5%;多巴胺的优势比为 1.17;95%置信区间为 0.97 至 1.42;P=0.10)。然而,多巴胺组心律失常事件的发生率高于去甲肾上腺素组(207 例[24.1%] vs. 102 例[12.4%],P<0.001)。亚组分析显示,与去甲肾上腺素相比,多巴胺与心源性休克患者 28 天死亡率的增加相关,但与感染性休克或低血容量性休克患者 28 天死亡率的增加无关(卡普兰-迈耶分析中,心源性休克的 P=0.03,感染性休克的 P=0.19,低血容量性休克的 P=0.84)。
虽然接受多巴胺作为一线升压药物治疗的休克患者与接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的患者之间的死亡率无显著差异,但多巴胺的使用与更多的不良事件相关。(临床试验注册号:NCT00314704)。