• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特托罗定治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的长期安全性、耐受性和疗效。

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in subjects with overactive bladder symptoms.

机构信息

University Hospital Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;64(5):584-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02361.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02361.x
PMID:20201992
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.

METHODS

This was an open-label extension study of a 12-week, double-blind fesoterodine study. During open-label treatment, all subjects received fesoterodine 8 mg for an initial 4 weeks, after which subjects could elect dose reduction to 4 mg or subsequent reescalation to 8 mg during clinic visits (dose reduction and reescalation each permitted once annually). The maximum allowable duration of open-label fesoterodine treatment ranged from 24 to 32 months across study sites. Safety and tolerability were evaluated via discontinuations, fesoterodine exposure, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and subject-reported treatment tolerance. Three-day bladder diaries and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed during the first 24 months of open-label treatment. PROs included evaluations of health-related quality of life [HRQL; King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF)], severity of bladder-related problems and treatment satisfaction. Subjects completed 3-day diaries before open-label baseline and months 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24; the ICIQ-SF and measures of bladder-related problems and treatment satisfaction at open-label baseline and months 4, 12 and 24; and the KHQ at open-label baseline and months 12 and 24.

RESULTS

Of the 417 eligible subjects who enrolled in the open-label extension, 61% continued fesoterodine treatment for > or = 24 months and 71% elected to maintain the fesoterodine 8-mg dose throughout treatment. No unexpected safety signals were observed. Most subjects rated treatment tolerance as at least 'good' throughout the study (> or = 88%). Dry mouth was the most commonly reported TEAE (34%) during open-label treatment, resulting in discontinuation in 2% of subjects (n = 8). Improvements from open-label baseline in OAB symptoms, HRQL and bladder-related problems were statistically significant at the earliest point measured and maintained through month 24. Treatment satisfaction rates were high throughout the study (> or = 84%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term fesoterodine treatment was well tolerated and associated with sustained improvements in OAB symptoms and HRQL.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者的长期安全性、耐受性和疗效。

方法

这是一项为期 12 周、双盲索利那新研究的开放性扩展研究。在开放性治疗期间,所有患者接受索利那新 8mg 治疗,初始 4 周,之后患者可选择减少剂量至 4mg 或在就诊时重新增加剂量至 8mg(每年各允许一次剂量减少和增加)。各研究地点的开放性索利那新治疗的最长允许时间范围为 24 至 32 个月。通过停药、索利那新暴露、治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)和患者报告的治疗耐受性来评估安全性和耐受性。在开放性治疗的前 24 个月中,通过 3 天膀胱日记和其他患者报告的结局(PRO)进行评估。PRO 包括健康相关生活质量评估[HRQL;King's 健康问卷(KHQ)和国际尿失禁咨询问卷-短表(ICIQ-SF)]、膀胱相关问题严重程度和治疗满意度。患者在开放性基线前和第 1、4、8、12 和 24 个月完成 3 天日记;在开放性基线和第 4、12 和 24 个月完成 ICIQ-SF 和膀胱相关问题及治疗满意度的评估;在开放性基线和第 12 和 24 个月完成 KHQ。

结果

在符合开放性扩展条件的 417 例合格患者中,61%的患者继续接受索利那新治疗≥24 个月,71%的患者选择在整个治疗过程中维持索利那新 8mg 剂量。未观察到意外的安全性信号。大多数患者在整个研究中(≥88%)均至少将治疗耐受性评为“良好”。在开放性治疗期间,口干是最常报告的不良事件(34%),导致 2%的患者(n=8)停药。与开放性基线相比,OAB 症状、HRQL 和膀胱相关问题在最早测量的时间点出现统计学意义上的显著改善,并持续至第 24 个月。整个研究中治疗满意度均较高(≥84%)。

结论

长期索利那新治疗具有良好的耐受性,并与 OAB 症状和 HRQL 的持续改善相关。

相似文献

1
Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in subjects with overactive bladder symptoms.特托罗定治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的长期安全性、耐受性和疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;64(5):584-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02361.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine in older and younger subjects with overactive bladder.特托罗定治疗老年和年轻膀胱过度活动症患者的疗效和耐受性。
Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.097. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
3
Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in men and women with overactive bladder symptoms.在有膀胱过度活动症症状的男性和女性中,非索罗定治疗的长期安全性、耐受性和疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 May;27(5):921-30. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.559581. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly patients with overactive bladder: open-label extension of the SOFIA trial.在患有膀胱过度活动症的老年患者中使用剂量灵活的非索罗定的长期安全性、耐受性和疗效:SOFIA 试验的开放性扩展。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jan;33(1):106-14. doi: 10.1002/nau.22383. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
5
Effects of voluntary dose escalation in a placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trial of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder.自愿增加剂量对膀胱过度活动症患者的安慰剂对照、灵活剂量试验中福多司坦的影响。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Nov;30(8):1480-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.21099. Epub 2011 May 10.
6
Early onset of fesoterodine efficacy in subjects with overactive bladder.特索罗定早期疗效在膀胱过度活动症患者中的体现。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(4):598-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09586.x. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
7
Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder.每日一次服用非索罗定治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的临床疗效、安全性及耐受性
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
8
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder.非索罗定与托特罗定治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的比较。
BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(9):1128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07907.x. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
9
A randomised, double-blind, parallel design, multi-institutional, non-inferiority phase IV trial of imidafenacin versus fesoterodine for overactive bladder.一项随机、双盲、平行设计、多中心、非劣效性 IV 期临床试验,比较伊米他滨与非索罗定治疗膀胱过度活动症。
Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;67(12):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12272.
10
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head-to-head placebo-controlled trial.非索罗定与托特罗定延长释放治疗膀胱过度活动症的比较:一项头对头安慰剂对照试验。
BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(1):58-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09086.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the Health-Related Quality of Life Burden of Overactive Bladder Using Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Literature Review.使用特定于疾病的患者报告结局测量来描述膀胱过度活动症的健康相关生活质量负担:系统文献回顾。
Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):548-562. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0880-8. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of solifenacin compared with oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the UK.在英国,索利那新与口服抗毒蕈碱药物治疗膀胱过度活动症患者的成本效益比较。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Mar 20;6(1):1438721. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1438721. eCollection 2018.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine flexible dose in newly diagnosed patients with overactive bladder in routine clinical practice in Spain.
西班牙常规临床实践中,非索罗定灵活剂量用于新诊断膀胱过度活动症患者的成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Sep 26;8:541-550. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S111646. eCollection 2016.
4
Overactive bladder, differential diagnosis, and clinical utility of fesoterodine.膀胱过度活动症、鉴别诊断和非索罗定的临床应用。
Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:943-51. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S24236. Epub 2012 Nov 12.