Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 May;25(3):174-81. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq007. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
The issue pertaining to the effect of multiple self-reported sports-related concussions on cognitive function is controversial. Although this topic has received increased attention in the literature recently, the issue remains unresolved. Evidence supporting a detrimental cognitive effect has been reported at a sub-concussive level and following one, two, and three or more previous concussions. However, numerous studies have been unable to replicate these findings. Additionally, discrepancies between neuropsychological testing formats have been identified, where studies utilizing traditional tests tend to support the notion of detrimental cognitive effects whereas studies with computerized tests have tended to demonstrate no effect. The present study sought to examine possible detrimental cognitive effects in a sample of adult male rugby union players who reported a history of three or more concussions (n = 34) compared with those who reported no previous concussions (n = 39). A computerized neuropsychological battery and a traditional neuropsychological measure of processing speed were administered for this purpose. Findings revealed that there were differences between groups on two processing speed measures from both traditional and computerized tests. Athletes with a history of multiple concussions performed significantly lower on these measures than those with no history of concussion. These results provide further evidence to suggest that a history of three or more self-reported concussions in active athletes may have a detrimental effect on cognitive function. Future research may focus on identifying moderating factors in an attempt to resolve some of the conflicting findings and identify potential athletes at risk for sustaining cognitive deficits.
关于多次自我报告的与运动相关的脑震荡对认知功能影响的问题存在争议。尽管这个话题最近在文献中受到了更多的关注,但这个问题仍然没有得到解决。有证据表明,在亚脑震荡水平以及一次、两次和三次或更多次先前脑震荡后,会产生有害的认知影响。然而,许多研究未能复制这些发现。此外,神经心理学测试格式之间也存在差异,使用传统测试的研究倾向于支持认知效果有害的观点,而使用计算机测试的研究则倾向于表明没有影响。本研究旨在检查报告有三次或更多次脑震荡(n = 34)的成年男性橄榄球运动员样本中是否存在可能的有害认知影响,与没有既往脑震荡史的运动员(n = 39)进行比较。为此,进行了计算机化神经心理学测试和传统的认知处理速度测试。研究结果显示,在传统和计算机测试的两个处理速度测试中,两组之间存在差异。有多次脑震荡史的运动员在这些测试中的表现明显低于没有脑震荡史的运动员。这些结果进一步表明,在活跃运动员中,有三次或更多次自我报告的脑震荡史可能对认知功能产生有害影响。未来的研究可能集中在确定调节因素上,以试图解决一些相互矛盾的发现,并确定可能存在认知缺陷风险的运动员。