• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中患者神经肌肉电刺激与上肢功能的量效关系。

Dose-response relation between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and upper-extremity function in patients with stroke.

出版信息

Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):821-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574160. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574160
PMID:20203321
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to investigate the effects of different doses of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on upper-extremity function in acute stroke patients with severe motor deficit.

METHODS

Sixty-six acute stroke patients were randomized to 3 groups: high NMES, low NMES, or control. The low-NMES group received 30 minutes of stimulation per day, and the high-NMES group received 60 minutes per day, for 4 weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale, Action Research Arm Test, and Motor Activity Log were used to assess the patients at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks post baseline (follow-up).

RESULTS

Both NMES groups showed significant improvement on Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment and Action Research Arm Test scales compared with the control group at week 4 and follow-up. The high-NMES group showed treatment effects similar to those of the low-NMES group.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher and lower doses of NMES led to similar improvements in motor function. A minimum of 10 hours of NMES in combination with regular rehabilitation may improve recovery of arm function in stroke patients during the acute stage.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在探讨不同剂量的神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对急性脑卒中伴严重运动功能障碍患者上肢功能的影响。

方法

66 例急性脑卒中患者随机分为 3 组:高 NMES 组、低 NMES 组和对照组。低 NMES 组每天接受 30 分钟刺激,高 NMES 组每天接受 60 分钟刺激,持续 4 周。在基线、4 周和 12 周(随访)时,采用 Fugl-Meyer 运动评估量表、动作研究臂测试和运动活动日志评估患者。

结果

与对照组相比,NMES 两组在第 4 周和随访时在 Fugl-Meyer 运动评估量表和动作研究臂测试量表上均有显著改善。高 NMES 组的治疗效果与低 NMES 组相似。

结论

较高和较低剂量的 NMES 均导致运动功能的相似改善。急性脑卒中患者在常规康复治疗的基础上,至少 10 小时的 NMES 治疗可能会改善手臂功能的恢复。

相似文献

1
Dose-response relation between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and upper-extremity function in patients with stroke.脑卒中患者神经肌肉电刺激与上肢功能的量效关系。
Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):821-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574160. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
2
Comparison of the Effects of Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Upper Extremity Functions in Patients with Stroke.对侧控制功能性电刺激与神经肌肉电刺激对中风患者上肢功能影响的比较
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2015;14(10):1260-6. doi: 10.2174/1871527315666151111122457.
3
Effects of the hybrid of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and noxious thermal stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.神经肌肉电刺激与有害热刺激联合应用对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能恢复的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Jan;26(1):66-72. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1540458. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
4
Combined arm stretch positioning and neuromuscular electrical stimulation during rehabilitation does not improve range of motion, shoulder pain or function in patients after stroke: a randomised trial.联合手臂拉伸定位和神经肌肉电刺激在康复期间并不能改善脑卒中后患者的关节活动度、肩部疼痛或功能:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2013 Dec;59(4):245-54. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70201-7.
5
Effect of functional electrical stimulation with mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function in poststroke patients.功能性电刺激联合镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Apr;23(4):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.06.017. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
6
Effectiveness of Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Functional Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.对侧控制功能性电刺激与神经肌肉电刺激对亚急性期脑卒中患者上肢运动功能恢复的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Neural Plast. 2021 Dec 22;2021:1987662. doi: 10.1155/2021/1987662. eCollection 2021.
7
Wrist Rehabilitation Assisted by an Electromyography-Driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Robot After Stroke.中风后由肌电图驱动的神经肌肉电刺激机器人辅助的手腕康复
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):767-76. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565510. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Upper-Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing EMG-Triggered, Cyclic, and Sensory Electrical Stimulation.中风后上肢功能恢复:一项比较肌电图触发、周期性和感觉性电刺激的随机对照试验
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Nov;30(10):978-987. doi: 10.1177/1545968316650278. Epub 2016 May 24.
9
Repetitive facilitative exercise under continuous electrical stimulation for severe arm impairment after sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.亚急性卒中后严重手臂功能障碍患者在持续电刺激下进行重复性促进训练:一项随机对照试验性研究
Brain Inj. 2014;28(2):203-10. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.860472. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke.脑卒中后神经肌肉电刺激促进上肢运动功能恢复的长期疗效。
J Rehabil Med. 2011 May;43(6):506-10. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0807.

引用本文的文献

1
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy With or Without Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Versus Conventional Therapy for Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.慢性卒中幸存者上肢功能的约束诱导运动疗法联合或不联合神经肌肉电刺激与传统疗法的比较:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 28;14:e68340. doi: 10.2196/68340.
2
The efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to conventional neuromuscular electrical stimulation for recovery of limb function following a stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与传统神经肌肉电刺激相比,对侧控制功能性电刺激在中风后肢体功能恢复中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 21;15:1340248. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1340248. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on upper-limb impairment after stroke: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial.经皮穴位电刺激对脑卒中后上肢功能障碍的影响:一项随机、对照、单盲试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 May;37(5):667-678. doi: 10.1177/02692155221138916. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Effectiveness of Repetitive Facilitative Exercise Combined with Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Improve Very Severe Paretic Upper Limbs in with Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.重复促进性运动联合电刺激疗法对改善脑卒中极重度瘫痪上肢的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Occup Ther Int. 2022 Apr 27;2022:4847363. doi: 10.1155/2022/4847363. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial.对比对侧控制功能性电刺激与周期性神经肌肉电刺激和任务导向训练在手卒中后手部功能恢复中的疗效:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 May 12;23(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06303-y.
6
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Improves Activities of Daily Living Post Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.神经肌肉电刺激改善中风后日常生活活动能力:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Nov 12;4(1):100167. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100167. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Impairment in Stroke: A Narrative Review on the Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Economic Statistics of Stroke and State of the Art Therapies.中风后上肢运动功能障碍的康复:关于中风患病率、危险因素、经济统计及最新疗法的叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;10(2):190. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020190.
8
Efficacy of a technology-based client-centred training system in neurological rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.基于技术的以客户为中心的培训系统在神经康复中的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Dec 28;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00977-2.
9
The effect of time spent in rehabilitation on activity limitation and impairment after stroke.康复时间对卒中后活动受限和功能障碍的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD012612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012612.pub2.
10
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation improves severe upper limb paresis in early acute phase stroke survivors.重复经颅磁刺激可改善急性脑卒中早期幸存者的严重上肢麻痹。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(4):569-575. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203085.