Sunbelt Collaborative, Tucson, AZ 85718, USA.
J Pers Disord. 2010 Feb;24(1):83-108. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.1.83.
The results of three rigorous studies of the naturalistic course of personality disorders indicate the following: (1) personality psychopathology improves over time at unexpectedly significant rates; (2) particular maladaptive personality traits are more stable than personality disorder diagnoses; (3) although personality psychopathology improves, residual effects are usually seen in the form of persistent functional impairment and ongoing Axis I psychopathology; and (4) improvement in personality psychopathology may eventually be associated with reduction in ongoing personal and social burden. A comparison of the longitudinal stability of personality disorders and mood disorders does not support a clear distinction between them based on differential stability of either psychopathology (at least based on remission rates) or functional impairment. Differences may yet emerge with respect to relapse rates over the longer term. Both types of disorders may share some common underlying vulnerabilities best conceptualized in term of personality traits. A group of promising, though methodologically flawed, family studies suggest familiality of at least BPD among the personality disorders and the coaggregation of BPD and depressive disorders (but not bipolar disorders) that may contribute to their frequent co-occurrence. Again, underlying personality traits may prove to be more heritable than either type of disorder.
(1)人格精神病理学随着时间的推移以惊人的速度改善;(2)特定的适应不良人格特征比人格障碍诊断更为稳定;(3)尽管人格精神病理学得到改善,但仍会以持续的功能障碍和持续的轴 I 精神病理学的形式出现残留效应;(4)人格精神病理学的改善最终可能与持续的个人和社会负担减轻有关。人格障碍和心境障碍的纵向稳定性比较不支持基于精神病理学(至少基于缓解率)或功能障碍的差异稳定性来明确区分它们。在长期内,复发率可能会出现差异。这两种类型的障碍可能具有一些共同的潜在弱点,最好用人格特征来概念化。一组有前途的、尽管方法上有缺陷的家族研究表明,人格障碍中至少存在 BPD 的家族性,以及 BPD 和抑郁障碍(但不是双相障碍)的共同聚集,这可能导致它们经常同时发生。同样,潜在的人格特征可能比任何一种障碍都更具遗传性。