Docherty Sharon, Bagust Jeff
AECC, 13-15 Parkwood Road, Bournemouth, BH5 2DF, UK.
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Jan 19;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-9.
Perception of subjective visual vertical (SVV) and horizontal (SVH) has traditionally been measured by rotating a mechanical rod either with or without a frame present. The computerised rod and frame (CRAF) system has previously only been used to measure SVV. We have expanded the use of this system by testing its feasibility to measure SVH. This was done by comparing two groups of subjects (n = 103) randomly assigned to be tested for SVV or SVH.
Preliminary results showed a higher than expected percentage of individuals with SVH errors < 0.5 degrees . This was attributed to additional visual cues provided by the changing appearance of the rod as it approached the horizontal. A solution to this problem was sought by replacing the rod by two dots to mark its ends. In a second investigation 30 subjects were tested using both the "rod as line" and "rod as dots" presentation. Bland and Altman analysis showed no difference between the rod and dots presentations in the measurement of SVV, but confirmed a fixed error of -0.93 degrees between rods and dots for SVH. Changing the rod from a line to dots in the computer system resulted in errors for both SVV and SVH that were comparable to previous studies using manual systems.
The computerized rod and frame system may be improved by replacement of the line with two dots. This reduces clues provided to the subject by the appearance of the rod on the screen.
传统上,主观视觉垂直(SVV)和水平(SVH)感知是通过旋转机械杆来测量的,测量时杆可以有或没有框架。计算机化杆和框架(CRAF)系统此前仅用于测量SVV。我们通过测试其测量SVH的可行性来扩展该系统的用途。这是通过比较两组随机分配接受SVV或SVH测试的受试者(n = 103)来完成的。
初步结果显示,SVH误差<0.5度的个体比例高于预期。这归因于杆接近水平时外观变化提供的额外视觉线索。通过用两个点代替杆来标记其末端来寻求解决这个问题的方法。在第二项研究中,30名受试者使用“杆为线”和“杆为点”两种呈现方式进行了测试。布兰德和奥特曼分析表明,在测量SVV时,杆和点的呈现方式之间没有差异,但证实了在测量SVH时,杆和点之间存在-0.93度的固定误差。在计算机系统中将杆从线改为点会导致SVV和SVH的误差,这些误差与之前使用手动系统的研究相当。
通过用两个点代替线,可以改进计算机化杆和框架系统。这减少了杆在屏幕上的外观给受试者提供的线索。