Department of Medicine, Electrophysiology and Pacing Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.
Heart Rhythm. 2010 May;7(5):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.029. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Control of atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction by endocardial stimulation of efferent AV nodal vagal fibers [atrioventricular nodal vagal stimulation (AVNS)] is a promising approach for long-term device-based modulation of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). However, few data on the efficacy of AVNS delivered as high-frequency stimulus packages (burst AVNS) in humans are available.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether burst AVNS can to modulate AV nodal conduction during AF and whether burst AVNS delivered during sinus rhythm (SR) in the effective atrial refractory period allows safe implantation of a permanent lead in a position suitable for AVNS.
Twenty patients (10 in SR and 10 in AF) who were candidates for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome were enrolled in the study. The posteroseptal right atrium was mapped to identify a location at which burst AVNS would achieve AV nodal conduction modulation (lengthening of PR interval in SR and reduction of ventricular rate in AF). Subsequently, a lead was screwed in at that site and burst stimulation (pulse rate 50 Hz, burst duration 180 ms) was delivered at different burst rates, pulse durations, and amplitudes.
In all SR patients, PR-interval prolongation was evoked at 90 and 120 bursts/minute with pulse durations < or =1 ms. Specifically, the mean voltages required to obtain PR-interval prolongation and advanced AV block were 4.3 +/- 2.2 V and 5.4 +/- 1.8 V (at 90 bursts/minute and 1 ms), respectively. Similarly, ventricular rate reduction was obtained in all AF patients, starting from 90 bursts/minute and 0.5-ms pulse duration (at 5.4 +/- 1.8 V). Ventricular arrhythmias were never induced during AVNS.
Endocardial right atrial burst AVNS reduces ventricular rate during AF. Burst AVNS delivered during SR in the effective atrial refractory period allows optimization of lead positioning for AVNS.
通过心内膜刺激传出房室结迷走纤维(房室结迷走神经刺激[AVNS])来控制房室(AV)结传导,是一种有前途的方法,可在心房颤动(AF)期间通过长期设备调节心室率。然而,目前关于在人体中给予高频刺激包(爆发 AVNS)的 AVNS 疗效的数据很少。
本研究的目的是确定爆发 AVNS 是否可在 AF 期间调节 AV 结传导,以及在窦性节律(SR)期间在有效心房不应期内给予爆发 AVNS 是否可安全地将永久性引线植入适合 AVNS 的位置。
研究纳入了 20 名因病态窦房结综合征而适合植入双腔起搏器的患者(10 名在 SR 中,10 名在 AF 中)。对后间隔右心房进行标测,以确定爆发 AVNS 可实现 AV 结传导调制(SR 中 PR 间期延长,AF 中心室率降低)的位置。随后,在此部位旋入一根引线,并以不同的爆发率、脉冲持续时间和幅度给予爆发刺激(脉冲率 50 Hz,爆发持续时间 180 ms)。
在所有 SR 患者中,在 90 和 120 个/分钟的爆发率下,当脉冲持续时间<或=1 ms 时,均可引发 PR 间期延长。具体而言,获得 PR 间期延长和高级房室传导阻滞所需的平均电压分别为 4.3+/-2.2 V 和 5.4+/-1.8 V(在 90 个/分钟和 1 ms 时)。同样,在所有 AF 患者中,从 90 个/分钟和 0.5-ms 脉冲持续时间开始,均获得了心室率降低(在 5.4+/-1.8 V 时)。在 AVNS 期间从未诱发过室性心律失常。
心内膜右心房爆发 AVNS 可降低 AF 时的心室率。在有效心房不应期内给予 SR 中的爆发 AVNS 可优化 AVNS 的引线定位。