• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床指南的编写和验证:一种模型驱动的方法。

Authoring and verification of clinical guidelines: a model driven approach.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2010 Aug;43(4):520-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.009
PMID:20206714
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this research is to provide a framework to enable authoring and verification of clinical guidelines. The framework is part of a larger research project aimed at improving the representation, quality and application of clinical guidelines in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

The verification process of a guideline is based on (1) model checking techniques to verify guidelines against semantic errors and inconsistencies in their definition, (2) combined with Model Driven Development (MDD) techniques, which enable us to automatically process manually created guideline specifications and temporal-logic statements to be checked and verified regarding these specifications, making the verification process faster and cost-effective. Particularly, we use UML statecharts to represent the dynamics of guidelines and, based on this manually defined guideline specifications, we use a MDD-based tool chain to automatically process them to generate the input model of a model checker. The model checker takes the resulted model together with the specific guideline requirements, and verifies whether the guideline fulfils such properties.

RESULTS

The overall framework has been implemented as an Eclipse plug-in named GBDSSGenerator which, particularly, starting from the UML statechart representing a guideline, allows the verification of the guideline against specific requirements. Additionally, we have established a pattern-based approach for defining commonly occurring types of requirements in guidelines. We have successfully validated our overall approach by verifying properties in different clinical guidelines resulting in the detection of some inconsistencies in their definition.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed framework allows (1) the authoring and (2) the verification of clinical guidelines against specific requirements defined based on a set of property specification patterns, enabling non-experts to easily write formal specifications and thus easing the verification process.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提供一个框架,以支持临床指南的编写和验证。该框架是一个更大的研究项目的一部分,旨在改善临床指南在日常临床实践中的表示、质量和应用。

方法

指南的验证过程基于(1)模型检查技术,以验证指南在其定义中的语义错误和不一致性,(2)结合模型驱动开发(MDD)技术,使我们能够自动处理手动创建的指南规范和时间逻辑语句,以检查和验证这些规范,使验证过程更快且具有成本效益。特别是,我们使用 UML 状态图来表示指南的动态,并基于此手动定义的指南规范,使用基于 MDD 的工具链自动处理它们,以生成模型检查器的输入模型。模型检查器将生成的模型与特定的指南要求一起使用,并验证指南是否满足这些属性。

结果

整个框架已实现为一个名为 GBDSSGenerator 的 Eclipse 插件,特别是从表示指南的 UML 状态图开始,允许根据特定要求验证指南。此外,我们已经建立了一种基于模式的方法来定义指南中常见类型的要求。我们已经通过验证不同临床指南中的属性成功验证了我们的整体方法,从而在其定义中检测到一些不一致。

结论

所提出的框架允许(1)编写和(2)根据一组属性规范模式验证临床指南是否符合特定要求,使非专家能够轻松编写正式规范,从而简化验证过程。

相似文献

1
Authoring and verification of clinical guidelines: a model driven approach.临床指南的编写和验证:一种模型驱动的方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Aug;43(4):520-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
2
Reasoning about clinical guidelines based on algebraic data types and constraint logic programming.基于代数数据类型和约束逻辑编程的临床指南推理。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Apr;92:103134. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103134. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
3
Towards a traceable clinical guidelines application. A model-driven approach.迈向可追溯的临床指南应用。一种模型驱动的方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(6):571-80. doi: 10.3414/ME09-01-0038. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
4
Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects.可共享的基于计算机的临床实践指南:基本原理、障碍、方法及前景
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):201-5.
5
Adopting model checking techniques for clinical guidelines verification.采用模型检查技术验证临床指南。
Artif Intell Med. 2010 Jan;48(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
6
Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.在GLIF3中处理表达性和可理解性要求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):241-5.
7
Enabling guidelines for computer-based decision support--process and tools.基于计算机的决策支持的启用指南——流程与工具
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):231-5.
8
Creating interoperable guidelines: requirements of vocabulary standards in immunization decision support.创建可互操作的指南:免疫接种决策支持中词汇标准的要求
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):930-4.
9
Hybrid specification, storage, retrieval and runtime application of clinical guidelines.临床指南的混合规范、存储、检索及运行时应用。
Neurol Sci. 2006 Jun;27 Suppl 3:S250-3. doi: 10.1007/s10072-006-0629-4.
10
Ability of expert physicians to structure clinical guidelines: reality versus perception.专家医生构建临床指南的能力:现实与认知。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1043-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01241.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal data representation, normalization, extraction, and reasoning: A review from clinical domain.时态数据表示、规范化、提取与推理:来自临床领域的综述
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 May;128:52-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Leveraging workflow control patterns in the domain of clinical practice guidelines.在临床实践指南领域利用工作流控制模式。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Feb 10;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0253-z.