Department of Energy Technology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Waste Manag. 2010 Jul;30(7):1414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 7.
Finding environmentally benign methods related to sound municipal solid waste (MSW) management is of highest priority in Southeast Asia. It is very important to study new approaches which can reduce waste generation and simultaneously enhance energy recovery. One concrete example of particular significance is the concept of hybrid dual-fuel power plants featuring MSW and another high-quality fuel like natural gas. The hybrid dual-fuel cycles provide significantly higher electrical efficiencies than a composite of separate single-fuel power plant (standalone gas turbine combined cycle and MSW incineration). Although hybrid versions are of great importance for energy conversion from MSW, an economic assessment of these systems must be addressed for a realistic appraisal of these technologies. This paper aims to further examine an economic assessment and energy model analysis of different conversion technologies. Energy models are developed to further refine the expected potential of MSW incineration with regards to energy recovery and environmental issues. Results show that MSW incineration can play role for greenhouse gas reduction, energy recovery and waste management. In Bangkok, the electric power production via conventional incineration and hybrid power plants can cover 2.5% and 8% of total electricity consumption, respectively. The hybrid power plants have a relative short payback period (5 years) and can further reduce the CO(2) levels by 3% in comparison with current thermal power plants.
寻找与声音城市固体废物(MSW)管理有关的环保方法是东南亚的最高优先级。研究可以减少废物产生并同时提高能源回收的新方法非常重要。一个特别重要的具体例子是混合双燃料电厂的概念,其特点是 MSW 和另一种高质量燃料,如天然气。混合双燃料循环提供的电力效率明显高于单独的单一燃料电厂(独立的燃气轮机联合循环和 MSW 焚烧)的组合。尽管混合版本对于从 MSW 进行能量转换非常重要,但必须对这些系统进行经济评估,以对这些技术进行实际评估。本文旨在进一步研究不同转换技术的经济评估和能源模型分析。能源模型的开发是为了进一步细化 MSW 焚烧在能源回收和环境问题方面的预期潜力。结果表明,MSW 焚烧可以在减少温室气体排放、能源回收和废物管理方面发挥作用。在曼谷,通过传统焚烧和混合电厂的电力生产可以分别覆盖总电力消耗的 2.5%和 8%。与现有火力发电厂相比,混合电厂的投资回收期相对较短(5 年),并可进一步将 CO2 水平降低 3%。