• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期乳腺癌中辅助托瑞米芬或他莫昔芬的疗效极佳。

Excellent outcomes with adjuvant toremifene or tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer.

机构信息

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 May 15;116(10):2307-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24940.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.24940
PMID:20209619
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fareston (toremifene) and tamoxifen, both selective estrogen receptor modulators, are therapeutically equivalent treatments for metastatic breast cancer. We hypothesized that toremifene as compared with tamoxifen given as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer would result in equivalent survival with an improved side effect profile, therefore, providing superior therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

The North American Fareston versus Tamoxifen Adjuvant trial assigned 1813 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive invasive breast cancer to adjuvant treatment with either tamoxifen or toremifene. The primary outcomes evaluated were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 59 months. The baseline characteristics of the 2 treatment groups were well-balanced. On the basis of intent-to-treat, 5-year actuarial DFS was not significantly different between tamoxifen and toremifene (91.2% [standard error of the mean [SE] 1.2%] vs 91.2% [SE 1.1%], respectively). Similarly, 5-year actuarial OS was not significantly different between tamoxifen and toremifene (92.7% [SE 1.1%] vs 93.7% [SE 1.0%], respectively). Controlling for patient age, tumor size, and tumor grade, a Cox multivariate survival analysis found no difference between patients randomized to toremifene versus tamoxifen in terms of OS (OR = 0.951; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.623-1.451, P = .951) or DFS (OR = 1.037; 95% CI, 0.721-1.491, P = .846). Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy enjoyed excellent DFS and OS. No significant differences were found between treatment with either tamoxifen or toremifene. Treatment of HR-positive patients with either tamoxifen or toremifene is appropriate.

摘要

背景

法乐通(托瑞米芬)和他莫昔芬都是选择性雌激素受体调节剂,对转移性乳腺癌的治疗效果相当。我们假设,与他莫昔芬相比,用于早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的托瑞米芬在具有改善的副作用特征的同时,能够获得等效的生存获益,从而提供更好的治疗效果。

方法

北美法乐通与他莫昔芬辅助治疗试验将 1813 例围绝经期或绝经后激素受体(HR)阳性浸润性乳腺癌患者随机分配接受他莫昔芬或托瑞米芬辅助治疗。主要终点评估是无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

中位随访时间为 59 个月。两组患者的基线特征均衡。基于意向治疗分析,他莫昔芬组和托瑞米芬组 5 年无病生存率无显著差异(91.2%[均数标准差(SE)1.2%]与 91.2%[SE 1.1%])。同样,他莫昔芬组和托瑞米芬组 5 年总生存率也无显著差异(92.7%[SE 1.1%]与 93.7%[SE 1.0%])。在控制患者年龄、肿瘤大小和肿瘤分级后,Cox 多变量生存分析发现,随机分配至托瑞米芬组和他莫昔芬组的患者在 OS(风险比[OR] = 0.951;95%置信区间[CI],0.623-1.451,P =.951)和 DFS(OR = 1.037;95%CI,0.721-1.491,P =.846)方面无差异。两组的不良反应相似。

结论

接受辅助激素治疗的女性DFS 和 OS 均极佳。他莫昔芬和托瑞米芬治疗组之间未发现显著差异。HR 阳性患者应用他莫昔芬或托瑞米芬治疗均合适。

相似文献

1
Excellent outcomes with adjuvant toremifene or tamoxifen in early stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中辅助托瑞米芬或他莫昔芬的疗效极佳。
Cancer. 2010 May 15;116(10):2307-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24940.
2
Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial efficacy and safety update analyses.阿那曲唑单药或与他莫昔芬联合应用对比他莫昔芬单药用于绝经后早期乳腺癌妇女的辅助治疗:ATAC(阿那曲唑、他莫昔芬单药或联合应用)试验疗效和安全性更新分析结果
Cancer. 2003 Nov 1;98(9):1802-10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11745.
3
Changes in bone mineral density during and after 3 years' use of tamoxifen or toremifene.他莫昔芬或托瑞米芬使用3年期间及之后的骨矿物质密度变化。
Maturitas. 2004 Jul 15;48(3):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.02.018.
4
Randomized trial of 2 versus 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen for women aged 50 years or older with early breast cancer: Italian Interdisciplinary Group Cancer Evaluation Study of Adjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer 01.针对50岁及以上早期乳腺癌女性辅助他莫昔芬治疗2年与5年的随机试验:意大利乳腺癌辅助治疗跨学科癌症评估研究01
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2276-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.116.
5
Benefit and projected cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.阿那曲唑与他莫昔芬作为早期雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者初始辅助治疗的获益及预期成本效益
Cancer. 2004 Sep 15;101(6):1311-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20492.
6
Toremifene is an effective and safe alternative to tamoxifen in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: results of four randomized trials.托瑞米芬是乳腺癌辅助内分泌治疗中一种有效且安全的他莫昔芬替代药物:四项随机试验的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;128(3):625-31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1556-5. Epub 2011 May 7.
7
Efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life in older women with early-stage breast cancer treated with letrozole or placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen: NCIC CTG intergroup trial MA.17.他莫昔芬治疗5年后,来曲唑或安慰剂治疗早期乳腺癌老年女性的疗效、毒性及生活质量:NCIC CTG组间试验MA.17
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):1956-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6334. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
8
Survival after adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen in operable breast cancer in premenopausal women.绝经前女性可手术乳腺癌患者辅助性卵巢切除术及他莫昔芬治疗后的生存情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 10;26(2):253-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6061. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
9
[Experience of high-dose toremifene treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer].[托瑞米芬高剂量治疗绝经后转移性乳腺癌患者的经验]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005 Oct;32(10):1415-9.
10
A phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma: final analysis with 10-year follow-up.一项可手术乳腺癌序贯辅助化疗的III期试验:10年随访的最终分析
Cancer. 2003 Jun 1;97(11):2716-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11396.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of the Axilla in Older Patients with Breast Cancer: Reassessing the Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.老年乳腺癌患者腋窝的管理:重新评估前哨淋巴结活检的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 24;17(17):2758. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172758.
2
Patient-reported outcome and survival in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients at moderate to high risk: comparing toremifene with aromatase inhibitor in a real-world study.中度至高度风险的绝经前激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的患者报告结局与生存情况:在一项真实世界研究中比较托瑞米芬与芳香化酶抑制剂
MedComm (2020). 2024 Sep 15;5(10):e698. doi: 10.1002/mco2.698. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
A narrative review: research progress of adjuvant intensive endocrine therapy for early breast cancer.
一篇叙述性综述:早期乳腺癌辅助强化内分泌治疗的研究进展
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 25;5:20. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-24-16. eCollection 2024.
4
Thrombosis of acute superior mesenteric artery in a patient with breast cancer receiving toremifene therapy: a case report and literature review.乳腺癌患者接受托瑞米芬治疗后发生急性肠系膜上动脉血栓形成:病例报告及文献复习。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02855-6.
5
Involvement of RFC3 in tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer through the cell cycle.RFC3 参与 ER 阳性乳腺癌的他莫昔芬耐药通过细胞周期。
Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Dec 6;15(23):13738-13752. doi: 10.18632/aging.205260.
6
Toremifene, an Alternative Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy, Is Better Than Tamoxifen in Breast Cancer Patients with CYP2D6*10 Mutant Genotypes.来曲唑作为一种辅助内分泌治疗药物,在 CYP2D6*10 突变基因型的乳腺癌患者中优于他莫昔芬。
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan;56(1):134-142. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.652. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
7
A prospective, randomized study of Toremifene vs. tamoxifen for the treatment of premenopausal breast cancer: safety and genital symptom analysis.托瑞米芬与他莫昔芬治疗绝经前乳腺癌的前瞻性、随机研究:安全性和生殖系统症状分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07156-x.
8
Targeting the Hippo Pathway for Breast Cancer Therapy.靶向河马通路用于乳腺癌治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Nov 5;10(11):422. doi: 10.3390/cancers10110422.
9
Adjuvant endocrine monotherapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer patients with hormone-receptor positive: a systemic review and network meta-analysis.绝经后激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌患者辅助内分泌单药治疗的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Jan;25(1):8-16. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0794-8. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
Toremifene in the treatment of breast cancer.托瑞米芬治疗乳腺癌。
World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):393-405. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.393.