Assikis Vasily, Buzdar Aman, Yang Ying, Smith Terry, Theriault Richard, Booser Daniel, Valero Vicente, Walters Ronald, Singletary Eva, Ames Frederick, Hortobagyi Gabriel
Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
Cancer. 2003 Jun 1;97(11):2716-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11396.
The current study was performed to assess whether sequential potentially noncross-resistant chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with operable breast carcinoma.
Seven hundred eighty-nine patients were registered and followed for a median of 10 years. They were treated in two groups. In Group 1, patients age < 50 years or age > 50 years but with either negative or unknown estrogen receptor (ER) status were randomized to receive 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) alone or followed by 4 cycles of methotrexate and vinblastine (MV). In Group 2, patients age > or = 50 years with ER-positive disease were randomized to receive either tamoxifen or combination chemotherapy (FAC + MV) for 10 cycles. Analysis was performed according to allocated treatment (intention to treat), with all randomized patients included.
In Group 1 there were no significant differences with regard to DFS or OS between the two treatment arms. The DFS at 5 years was 0.70 and 0.76, respectively, for FAC compared with FAC+MV (P = 0.26). The OS was similar for both groups (0.84 vs. 0.83). It is interesting to note that there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for improved DFS in the FAC + MV arm for patients who were ER-positive. In Group 2, tamoxifen alone led to more prolonged DFS compared to FAC+MV (0.78 vs. 0.66, respectively) but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.28). OS also was associated with a trend (P = 0.86) toward prolonged survival for the tamoxifen arm compared with the FAC+MV arm (0.85 vs. 0.74, respectively).
The results of the current trial concerning sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma, which to our knowledge contains the longest follow-up presented to date, failed to demonstrate any additional benefit from the addition of 4 cycles of MV to 6 cycles of FAC chemotherapy.
本研究旨在评估序贯使用可能无交叉耐药性的化疗方案是否能延长可手术乳腺癌患者的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。
登记了789例患者并进行了中位时间为10年的随访。他们被分为两组治疗。在第1组中,年龄<50岁或年龄>50岁但雌激素受体(ER)状态为阴性或未知的患者被随机分配接受6个周期的5-氟尿嘧啶、多柔比星和环磷酰胺(FAC)单药治疗,或随后接受4个周期的甲氨蝶呤和长春碱(MV)治疗。在第2组中,年龄≥50岁且ER阳性疾病的患者被随机分配接受他莫昔芬或联合化疗(FAC + MV)10个周期。根据分配的治疗进行分析(意向性治疗),纳入所有随机分组的患者。
在第1组中,两个治疗组在DFS或OS方面无显著差异。FAC组与FAC + MV组相比,5年时的DFS分别为0.70和0.76(P = 0.26)。两组的OS相似(0.84对0.83)。有趣的是,对于ER阳性的患者,FAC + MV组的DFS有统计学上无显著意义的改善趋势。在第2组中,单独使用他莫昔芬导致的DFS比FAC + MV组更长(分别为0.78对0.66),但未达到统计学意义(P = 0.28)。与FAC + MV组相比,他莫昔芬组的OS也有延长生存的趋势(P = 0.86)(分别为0.85对0.74)。
关于可手术乳腺癌序贯辅助化疗的当前试验结果,据我们所知是迄今为止随访时间最长的,未能证明在6个周期的FAC化疗基础上加用4个周期的MV有任何额外益处。