Zele Andrew J, Wood Joanne M, Girgenti Cameron C
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation & School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.
Vision Res. 2010 May 12;50(10):969-76. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
To evaluate whether luminance contrast discrimination losses in amblyopia on putative magnocellular (MC) and parvocellular (PC) pathway tasks reflect deficits at retinogeniculate or cortical sites. Fifteen amblyopes including six anisometropes, seven strabismics, two mixed and 12 age-matched controls were investigated. Contrast discrimination was measured using established psychophysical procedures that differentiate MC and PC processing. Data were described with a model of the contrast response of primate retinal ganglion cells. All amblyopes and controls displayed the same contrast signatures on the MC and PC tasks, with three strabismics having reduced sensitivity. Amblyopic PC contrast gain was similar to electrophysiological estimates from visually normal, non-human primates. Sensitivity losses evident in a subset of the amblyopes reflect cortical summation deficits, with no change in retinogeniculate contrast responses. The data do not support the proposal that amblyopic contrast sensitivity losses on MC and PC tasks reflect retinogeniculate deficits, but rather are due to anomalous post-retinogeniculate cortical processing of retinal signals.
为评估弱视患者在假定的大细胞(MC)和小细胞(PC)通路任务中亮度对比度辨别能力的损失是否反映了视网膜神经节或皮质部位的缺陷。研究了15名弱视患者,其中包括6名屈光参差患者、7名斜视患者、2名混合性患者以及12名年龄匹配的对照者。使用区分MC和PC处理的既定心理物理学程序测量对比度辨别能力。数据用灵长类视网膜神经节细胞的对比度反应模型进行描述。所有弱视患者和对照者在MC和PC任务中表现出相同的对比度特征,3名斜视患者的敏感度降低。弱视患者的PC对比度增益与视觉正常的非人类灵长类动物的电生理估计值相似。一部分弱视患者中明显的敏感度损失反映了皮质总和缺陷,视网膜神经节对比度反应没有变化。数据不支持弱视患者在MC和PC任务中对比度敏感度损失反映视网膜神经节缺陷这一观点,而是由于视网膜信号在视网膜神经节后皮质处理异常所致。