Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;8(2):124-33. doi: 10.1370/afm.1090.
Antibiotics are only beneficial for subgroups of patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and rhinosinusitis in family practice, yet overprescribing for these conditions is common. C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing and delayed prescribing are useful strategies to reduce antibiotic prescribing, but both have limitations. We evaluated the effect of CRP assistance in antibiotic prescribing strategies-including delayed prescribing-in the management of LRTI and rhinosinusitis.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 258 patients were enrolled (107 LRTI and 151 rhinosinusitis) by 32 family physicians. Patients were individually randomized to CRP assistance or routine care (control). Primary outcome was antibiotic use after the index consultation. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic use during the 28-day follow-up, patient satisfaction, and clinical recovery.
Patients in the CRP-assisted group used fewer antibiotics (43.4%) than control patients (56.6%) after the index consultation (relative risk [RR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.98). This difference remained significant during follow-up (52.7% vs 65.1%; RR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99). Delayed prescriptions in the CRP-assisted group were filled only in a minority of cases (23% vs 72% in control group, P < .001). Recovery was similar across groups. Satisfaction with care was higher in patients managed with CRP assistance (P = .03).
CRP point-of-care testing to assist in prescribing decisions, including delayed prescribing, for LRTI and rhinosinusitis may be a useful strategy to decrease antibiotic use and increase patient satisfaction without compromising patient recovery.
抗生素仅对家庭实践中急性下呼吸道感染(LRTI)和鼻-鼻窦炎的亚组患者有益,但对此类疾病的过度处方很常见。C 反应蛋白(CRP)即时检测和延迟处方是减少抗生素处方的有用策略,但都有其局限性。我们评估了 CRP 辅助在抗生素处方策略中的作用,包括延迟处方,用于治疗 LRTI 和鼻-鼻窦炎。
我们进行了一项随机对照试验,32 名家庭医生纳入了 258 名患者(107 例 LRTI 和 151 例鼻-鼻窦炎)。患者被单独随机分配到 CRP 辅助组或常规护理组(对照组)。主要结局是指数咨询后的抗生素使用情况。次要结局包括 28 天随访期间的抗生素使用情况、患者满意度和临床康复情况。
CRP 辅助组患者在指数咨询后使用抗生素的比例(43.4%)低于对照组(56.6%)(相对风险 [RR] = 0.77;95%置信区间 [CI],0.56-0.98)。在随访期间,这种差异仍然显著(52.7%比 65.1%;RR = 0.81;95% CI,0.62-0.99)。CRP 辅助组的延迟处方仅在少数情况下得到了填补(23%比对照组的 72%,P <.001)。两组的康复情况相似。接受 CRP 辅助治疗的患者对护理的满意度更高(P =.03)。
CRP 即时检测辅助 LRTI 和鼻-鼻窦炎的处方决策,包括延迟处方,可能是减少抗生素使用和提高患者满意度而不影响患者康复的有用策略。