Cals Jochen W L, Butler Christopher C, Hopstaken Rogier M, Hood Kerenza, Dinant Geert-Jan
Department of General Practice, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands.
BMJ. 2009 May 5;338:b1374. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1374.
To assess the effect of general practitioner testing for C reactive protein (disease approach) and receiving training in enhanced communication skills (illness approach) on antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infection.
Pragmatic, 2x2 factorial, cluster randomised controlled trial.
20 general practices in the Netherlands.
40 general practitioners from 20 practices recruited 431 patients with lower respiratory tract infection.
The primary outcome was antibiotic prescribing at the index consultation. Secondary outcomes were antibiotic prescribing during 28 days' follow-up, reconsultation, clinical recovery, and patients' satisfaction and enablement.
General practitioners' use of C reactive protein point of care testing and training in enhanced communication skills separately and combined, and usual care.
General practitioners in the C reactive protein test group prescribed antibiotics to 31% of patients compared with 53% in the no test group (P=0.02). General practitioners trained in enhanced communication skills prescribed antibiotics to 27% of patients compared with 54% in the no training group (P<0.01). Both interventions showed a statistically significant effect on antibiotic prescribing at any point during the 28 days' follow-up. Clinicians in the combined intervention group prescribed antibiotics to 23% of patients (interaction term was non-significant). Patients' recovery and satisfaction were similar in all study groups.
Both general practitioners' use of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in enhanced communication skills significantly reduced antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infection without compromising patients' recovery and satisfaction with care. A combination of the illness and disease focused approaches may be necessary to achieve the greatest reduction in antibiotic prescribing for this common condition in primary care.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN85154857.
评估全科医生进行C反应蛋白检测(疾病导向方法)以及接受强化沟通技巧培训(病患导向方法)对下呼吸道感染抗生素处方的影响。
实用的2×2析因整群随机对照试验。
荷兰的20家全科诊所。
来自20家诊所的40名全科医生招募了431名下呼吸道感染患者。
主要结局是初次会诊时的抗生素处方情况。次要结局包括28天随访期间的抗生素处方情况、再次会诊、临床康复情况以及患者的满意度和就医体验。
全科医生分别单独使用C反应蛋白即时检测、接受强化沟通技巧培训以及两者结合使用,还有常规治疗。
C反应蛋白检测组的全科医生给31%的患者开具了抗生素,而未进行检测的组为53%(P = 0.02)。接受强化沟通技巧培训的全科医生给27%的患者开具了抗生素,未接受培训的组为54%(P<0.01)。两种干预措施在28天随访期间的任何时间点对抗生素处方都显示出统计学上的显著效果。联合干预组的临床医生给23%的患者开具了抗生素(交互项无显著性)。所有研究组中患者的康复情况和满意度相似。
全科医生使用C反应蛋白即时检测以及接受强化沟通技巧培训均显著减少了下呼吸道感染的抗生素处方,且不影响患者的康复情况和对治疗的满意度。对于基层医疗中这种常见病症,可能需要将病患导向和疾病导向方法相结合,以最大程度减少抗生素处方。
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN85154857 。