Heparin is not required for peripheral intravenous locks in neonates.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy and safety of peripheral intravenous locks maintained with heparin saline solutions compared with those maintained with normal saline.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial comparing the two methods of maintaining peripheral intravenous locks.

SETTING

Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta.

PATIENTS

Neonates requiring the maintenance of intravenous locks for medications, primarily antibiotics, were randomly placed in either a heparin saline (n=93) or normal saline (n=93) group.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were chosen to receive either heparinized saline (5 units/mL) or normal saline, 0.3 mL in the intravenous catheter every 6 h, administered by nursing staff in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

There was no difference in catheter lifespan (39+/-24 h for the heparinized saline group; 34+/-22 h for the normal saline group) and no difference in the number of intravenous catheters per patient (1.9 heparinized group, 1.6 normal saline group). There were no differences in the reasons for catheter removal, complications at the skin site or systemic bleeding including intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups. The risk of catheter occlusion was inversely correlated with gestational age and the administration of vancomycin and cefotaxime versus ampicillin and gentamicin.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparin is not required for the maintenance of peripheral intravenous locks in neonates regardless of the solution used. Catheter occlusion is more likely to be associated with a low gestational age and the administration of vancomycin and cefotaxime versus ampicillin and gentamicin.