Suppr超能文献

碳酸洛地那非片治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效和耐受性:III 期临床试验。

Efficacy and tolerability of lodenafil carbonate for oral therapy of erectile dysfunction: a phase III clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hospital Ipiranga, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2010 May;7(5):1928-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01711.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This is a phase III, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on lodenafil carbonate (LC), a novel phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor developed in Brazil.

AIM

Expanding information on LC efficacy and safety.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile domain, positive answers to the sexual encounter profile (SEP)-2 and SEP-3 questions and incidence of adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

A total of 350 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) of all degrees were randomized to placebo, LC 40 mg or LC 80 mg and followed for 4 weeks. They completed the IIEF and answered the SEP questions 2 and 3 after each intercourse without and with the use of LC.

RESULTS

IIEF Erectile Domain scores without and with the use of medication were the following (mean [M] +/- standard deviation [SD]): placebo = 13.9 +/- 5.2 and 14.8 +/- 7.8; LC 40 mg = 13.6 +/- 5.3 and 18.6 +/- 8.0; LC 80 mg = 13.4 +/- 4.9 and 20.6 +/- 7.7 (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P < 0.01). Positive answers to SEP-2 without and with the use of medication were the following (M +/- SD): placebo = 55.3 +/- 43.2% and 52.1 +/- 41.4%; LC 40 mg = 46.4 +/- 44.3% and 63.5 +/- 42.0%; LC 80 mg = 50.2 +/- 40.9% and 80.8 +/- 32.3% (ANOVA P < 0.01). Positive answers to SEP-3 were the following: placebo = 20.2 +/- 32.3% and 29.7 +/- 38.1%; LC 40 mg = 19.6 +/- 34.3% and 50.8 +/- 44.4%; LC 80 mg = 20.8 +/- 33.2% and 66.0 +/- 39.3% (ANOVA P < 0.01). The patients with at least one AE were placebo = 28.7%, LC 40 mg = 40.9%, and LC 80 mg = 49.5%. AEs whose incidence was significantly higher with LC than with placebo included rhinitis, headache, flushing, visual disorder, and dizziness.

CONCLUSIONS

LC showed a satisfactory efficacy-safety profile for oral therapy of ED.

摘要

简介

这是一项在巴西开发的新型磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂——洛地那非碳酸酯(LC)的 III 期、前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。

目的

扩大 LC 疗效和安全性信息。

主要观察指标

国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)勃起功能域、性经历问卷(SEP)-2 和 SEP-3 阳性回答以及不良事件(AE)发生率。

方法

共纳入 350 名不同程度勃起功能障碍(ED)的男性,随机分为安慰剂组、LC40mg 组和 LC80mg 组,随访 4 周。他们在每次性交前后填写 IIEF 并回答 SEP 问题 2 和 3,期间不使用和使用 LC。

结果

无药物治疗和有药物治疗时 IIEF 勃起功能域评分如下(均值[M]±标准差[SD]):安慰剂组=13.9±5.2 和 14.8±7.8;LC40mg 组=13.6±5.3 和 18.6±8.0;LC80mg 组=13.4±4.9 和 20.6±7.7(方差分析[ANOVA]P<0.01)。无药物治疗和有药物治疗时 SEP-2 阳性回答如下(M±SD):安慰剂组=55.3±43.2%和 52.1±41.4%;LC40mg 组=46.4±44.3%和 63.5±42.0%;LC80mg 组=50.2±40.9%和 80.8±32.3%(ANOVA P<0.01)。SEP-3 阳性回答如下:安慰剂组=20.2±32.3%和 29.7±38.1%;LC40mg 组=19.6±34.3%和 50.8±44.4%;LC80mg 组=20.8±33.2%和 66.0±39.3%(ANOVA P<0.01)。至少有一种 AE 的患者中,安慰剂组=28.7%,LC40mg 组=40.9%,LC80mg 组=49.5%。与安慰剂相比,LC 导致的 AE 发生率明显更高,包括鼻炎、头痛、潮红、视力障碍和头晕。

结论

LC 对口服治疗 ED 具有良好的疗效-安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验