Department of Urology, Hospital Ipiranga, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Sex Med. 2010 May;7(5):1928-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01711.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
This is a phase III, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on lodenafil carbonate (LC), a novel phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor developed in Brazil.
Expanding information on LC efficacy and safety.
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile domain, positive answers to the sexual encounter profile (SEP)-2 and SEP-3 questions and incidence of adverse events (AEs).
A total of 350 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) of all degrees were randomized to placebo, LC 40 mg or LC 80 mg and followed for 4 weeks. They completed the IIEF and answered the SEP questions 2 and 3 after each intercourse without and with the use of LC.
IIEF Erectile Domain scores without and with the use of medication were the following (mean [M] +/- standard deviation [SD]): placebo = 13.9 +/- 5.2 and 14.8 +/- 7.8; LC 40 mg = 13.6 +/- 5.3 and 18.6 +/- 8.0; LC 80 mg = 13.4 +/- 4.9 and 20.6 +/- 7.7 (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P < 0.01). Positive answers to SEP-2 without and with the use of medication were the following (M +/- SD): placebo = 55.3 +/- 43.2% and 52.1 +/- 41.4%; LC 40 mg = 46.4 +/- 44.3% and 63.5 +/- 42.0%; LC 80 mg = 50.2 +/- 40.9% and 80.8 +/- 32.3% (ANOVA P < 0.01). Positive answers to SEP-3 were the following: placebo = 20.2 +/- 32.3% and 29.7 +/- 38.1%; LC 40 mg = 19.6 +/- 34.3% and 50.8 +/- 44.4%; LC 80 mg = 20.8 +/- 33.2% and 66.0 +/- 39.3% (ANOVA P < 0.01). The patients with at least one AE were placebo = 28.7%, LC 40 mg = 40.9%, and LC 80 mg = 49.5%. AEs whose incidence was significantly higher with LC than with placebo included rhinitis, headache, flushing, visual disorder, and dizziness.
LC showed a satisfactory efficacy-safety profile for oral therapy of ED.
这是一项在巴西开发的新型磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂——洛地那非碳酸酯(LC)的 III 期、前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
扩大 LC 疗效和安全性信息。
国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)勃起功能域、性经历问卷(SEP)-2 和 SEP-3 阳性回答以及不良事件(AE)发生率。
共纳入 350 名不同程度勃起功能障碍(ED)的男性,随机分为安慰剂组、LC40mg 组和 LC80mg 组,随访 4 周。他们在每次性交前后填写 IIEF 并回答 SEP 问题 2 和 3,期间不使用和使用 LC。
无药物治疗和有药物治疗时 IIEF 勃起功能域评分如下(均值[M]±标准差[SD]):安慰剂组=13.9±5.2 和 14.8±7.8;LC40mg 组=13.6±5.3 和 18.6±8.0;LC80mg 组=13.4±4.9 和 20.6±7.7(方差分析[ANOVA]P<0.01)。无药物治疗和有药物治疗时 SEP-2 阳性回答如下(M±SD):安慰剂组=55.3±43.2%和 52.1±41.4%;LC40mg 组=46.4±44.3%和 63.5±42.0%;LC80mg 组=50.2±40.9%和 80.8±32.3%(ANOVA P<0.01)。SEP-3 阳性回答如下:安慰剂组=20.2±32.3%和 29.7±38.1%;LC40mg 组=19.6±34.3%和 50.8±44.4%;LC80mg 组=20.8±33.2%和 66.0±39.3%(ANOVA P<0.01)。至少有一种 AE 的患者中,安慰剂组=28.7%,LC40mg 组=40.9%,LC80mg 组=49.5%。与安慰剂相比,LC 导致的 AE 发生率明显更高,包括鼻炎、头痛、潮红、视力障碍和头晕。
LC 对口服治疗 ED 具有良好的疗效-安全性。