Center for Cognitive Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Psychol Med. 2010 Dec;40(12):1979-86. doi: 10.1017/S003329171000019X. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
Encoding and maintenance of information in working memory, followed by internal manipulation of that information for planning adaptive behavior, are two key components of working-memory systems. Both processes have been reported to be impaired in schizophrenia, but few studies have directly compared the relative severity of these abnormalities, or the degree to which manipulation deficits might be secondary to alterations in maintenance processes.
Clinically stable schizophrenia patients (n=25) and a demographically similar healthy comparison group (n=24) were administered a verbal span task with three levels of working-memory load. Maintenance was assessed using sequential position questions. Manipulation processes were assessed by requiring comparison of the relative sequential position of test items, which entailed simultaneous serial search strategies regarding item order.
Both groups showed reduced accuracy and increased reaction time for manipulation compared with maintenance processing. There were significant patient impairments across working-memory loads. There was no differential deficit in manipulation processing, and effect sizes of relative deficit in the patient group were higher for maintenance than manipulation processing.
The strong correlation for maintenance and manipulation deficits suggest that impairments in the ability to internally manipulate information stored in working-memory systems are not greater than alterations in the encoding and maintaining of information in working memory and that disturbances in maintenance processing may contribute to deficits in higher-order working-memory operations.
工作记忆中的信息编码和维持,以及随后对该信息进行内部操作以规划适应性行为,是工作记忆系统的两个关键组成部分。这两个过程在精神分裂症中都被报道存在损伤,但很少有研究直接比较这些异常的相对严重程度,或者操作缺陷的程度是否可能继发于维持过程的改变。
我们对 25 名临床稳定的精神分裂症患者和 24 名具有相似人口统计学特征的健康对照组进行了一项言语工作记忆容量测试,该测试有三个工作记忆负荷水平。维持能力通过连续位置问题进行评估。操作过程通过比较测试项目的相对顺序来评估,这需要关于项目顺序的同时连续搜索策略。
与维持过程相比,两组在操作上的准确性都降低,反应时间都延长。患者在整个工作记忆负荷下都存在明显的损伤。在操作处理方面没有差异缺陷,并且患者组相对缺陷的效应大小在维持处理方面高于操作处理。
维持和操作缺陷的强烈相关性表明,内部操作存储在工作记忆系统中的信息的能力受损并不大于信息在工作记忆中的编码和维持的改变,并且维持处理的障碍可能导致高阶工作记忆操作的缺陷。