Suppr超能文献

表皮生长因子受体拮抗剂所致皮疹的治疗:德国肿瘤学家的一项调查结果

Treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonist-induced skin rash: results of a survey among German oncologists.

作者信息

Hassel Jessica C, Kripp Melanie, Al-Batran Salah, Hofheinz Ralf-Dieter

机构信息

Clinical Cooperation Unit for Dermatooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Onkologie. 2010;33(3):94-8. doi: 10.1159/000277656. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skin toxicities are frequent in patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonists. Grading and management of these skin reactions are poorly standardized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a survey among German oncologists using a 7-item questionnaire distributed by e-mail via the working groups Internistische Onkologie (AIO) and Dermatologische Onkologie (ADO). The oncologists were provided with pictures and history of a patient with an acneiform rash and were asked to provide information on grading and treatment strategies.

RESULTS

106 medical oncologists and 43 dermatooncologists responded to the survey. The scoring of the skin rash was indicated as follows (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCICTC) grades 1/2/3;%): 10/59/31. 22% of the polled medical oncologists use preemptive treatment of skin rash. In the presented case, 91% chose local treatment with mainly hydrocortisone or antibiotic cream, and 64% chose systemic treatment with an antibiotic or isotretinoin. Only 9% of the medical oncologists would have referred the patient to a dermatologist. Dermatooncologists used more local antibiotics (p = 0.006) and rather less local steroids (p = 0.199). With regard to systemic treatment, dermatooncologists more often used isotretinoin (p = 0.002). In addition, dermatooncologists less often delayed cetuximab treatment because of skin toxicity (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present analysis illustrate that grading and treatment of EGFR antagonistinduced skin toxicities are very heterogeneous. Clearly, more randomized trials and a simple and reliable grading system are warranted.

摘要

背景

接受表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)拮抗剂治疗的患者经常出现皮肤毒性反应。这些皮肤反应的分级和管理标准很不完善。

材料与方法

我们通过德国内科肿瘤学工作组(AIO)和皮肤科肿瘤学工作组(ADO)以电子邮件方式向德国肿瘤学家发放了一份包含7个问题的调查问卷。向肿瘤学家提供了一名患有痤疮样皮疹患者的图片和病史,并要求他们提供关于分级和治疗策略的信息。

结果

106名医学肿瘤学家和43名皮肤科肿瘤学家回复了调查。皮疹的评分结果如下(美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准(NCICTC)1/2/3级;%):10/59/31。22%的参与调查的医学肿瘤学家采用皮疹的预防性治疗。在该病例中,91%的人选择主要使用氢化可的松或抗生素乳膏进行局部治疗,64%的人选择使用抗生素或异维A酸进行全身治疗。只有9%的医学肿瘤学家会将患者转诊给皮肤科医生。皮肤科肿瘤学家更多地使用局部抗生素(p = 0.006),而较少使用局部类固醇(p = 0.199)。在全身治疗方面,皮肤科肿瘤学家更常使用异维A酸(p = 0.002)。此外,皮肤科肿瘤学家因皮肤毒性而延迟西妥昔单抗治疗的情况较少(p = 0.009)。

结论

本分析结果表明,EGFR拮抗剂引起的皮肤毒性反应的分级和治疗差异很大。显然,需要更多的随机试验和一个简单可靠的分级系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验