Suppr超能文献

多中心分析评估 Abbott ARCHITECT 环孢素测定法。

Multisite analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT cyclosporine assay.

机构信息

Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Apr;32(2):145-51. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181d46386.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Abbott ARCHITECT Cyclosporine (CsA) immunoassay in 7 clinical laboratories in comparison to liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), Abbott TDx, Cobas Integra 800, and the Dade Dimension Xpand immunoassay. The ARCHITECT assay uses a whole blood specimen, a pretreatment step with organic reagents to precipitate proteins and extract the drug, followed by a 2-step automated immunoassay with magnetic microparticles coated with anti-CsA antibody and an acridinium-CsA tracer. Imprecision testing at the 7 evaluation sites gave a range of total % coefficient of variations of 7.5%-12.2% at 87.5 ng/mL, 6.6%-14.3% at 411 ng/mL, and 5.2%-10.7% at 916 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification ranged from 12 to 20 ng/mL. Purified CsA metabolites AM1, AM1c, AM4N, AM9, and AM19 were tested in whole blood by the ARCHITECT assay and showed minimal cross-reactivity at all 7 sites. In particular, AM1 and AM9 cross-reactivity in the ARCHITECT assay, ranged from -2.5% to 0.2% and -0.8% to 2.2%, respectively, and was significantly lower than for the TDx assay, in which the values were 3.2% and 16.1%, respectively. Comparable testing of metabolites in the Dade Dimension Xpand assay at 2 evaluation sites showed cross-reactivity to AM4N (6.4% and 6.8%) and AM9 (2.6% and 3.6%) and testing on the Roche Integra 800 showed cross-reactivity to AM1c (2.4%), AM9 (10.7%), and AM19 (2.8%). Cyclosporine International Proficiency Testing Scheme samples, consisting of both pooled specimens from patients receiving CsA therapy as well as whole-blood specimens supplemented with CsA, were tested by the ARCHITECT assay at 6 sites and showed an average bias of -24 to -58 ng/mL versus LC/MSMS CsA and -2 to -37 ng/mL versus AxSYM CsA. Studies were performed with the ARCHITECT CsA assay on patient specimens with the following results: ARCHITECT CsA assay versus LC/MSMS, average bias of 31 ng/mL; ARCHITECT versus the Dade Dimension assay (4 sites), average biases of -7 to -228 ng/mL; ARCHITECT versus AxSYM and TDx, average biases of -4 and -53 ng/mL, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients were >or=0.89. The ARCHITECT CsA assay has significantly reduced CsA metabolite interference relative to other immunoassays and is a convenient and sensitive semiautomated method to measure CsA in whole blood.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估 Abbott ARCHITECT 环孢素 (CsA) 免疫分析在 7 个临床实验室中的分析性能,与液相色谱/串联质谱 (LC/MS/MS)、Abbott TDx、Cobas Integra 800 和 Dade Dimension Xpand 免疫分析进行比较。ARCHITECT 分析采用全血标本,用有机试剂进行预处理步骤以沉淀蛋白质并提取药物,然后进行两步自动化免疫分析,使用包被有抗 CsA 抗体的磁性微球和吖啶标记的 CsA 示踪剂。在 7 个评估点进行精密度测试时,在 87.5ng/mL 时总变异系数为 7.5%-12.2%,在 411ng/mL 时为 6.6%-14.3%,在 916ng/mL 时为 5.2%-10.7%。定量下限范围为 12 至 20ng/mL。用 ARCHITECT 分析测试全血中的纯化 CsA 代谢物 AM1、AM1c、AM4N、AM9 和 AM19,在所有 7 个地点均显示出最小的交叉反应性。特别是,ARCHITECT 分析中 AM1 和 AM9 的交叉反应性分别为-2.5%至 0.2%和-0.8%至 2.2%,明显低于 TDx 分析中的 3.2%和 16.1%。在 2 个评估点对 Dade Dimension Xpand 分析中的代谢物进行类似测试,显示对 AM4N(6.4%和 6.8%)和 AM9(2.6%和 3.6%)的交叉反应性,在 Roche Integra 800 上进行测试显示对 AM1c(2.4%)、AM9(10.7%)和 AM19(2.8%)的交叉反应性。CsA 国际能力测试计划样本由接受 CsA 治疗的患者的混合标本以及添加 CsA 的全血标本组成,在 6 个地点用 ARCHITECT 分析进行测试,与 LC/MSMS CsA 相比平均偏差为-24 至-58ng/mL,与 AxSYM CsA 相比平均偏差为-2 至-37ng/mL。使用 ARCHITECT CsA 分析在患者标本上进行了研究,结果如下:ARCHITECT CsA 分析与 LC/MSMS 相比,平均偏差为 31ng/mL;ARCHITECT 与 Dade Dimension 分析(4 个地点)相比,平均偏差为-7 至-228ng/mL;ARCHITECT 与 AxSYM 和 TDx 相比,平均偏差分别为-4 和-53ng/mL。Spearman 相关系数> = 0.89。ARCHITECT CsA 分析与其他免疫分析相比,显著减少了 CsA 代谢物的干扰,是一种方便、敏感的半自动化方法,可用于测量全血中的 CsA。

相似文献

1
Multisite analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT cyclosporine assay.
Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Apr;32(2):145-51. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181d46386.
2
Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay.
Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Apr;31(2):198-204. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31819c6a37.
3
Cyclosporine metabolite cross-reactivity in different cyclosporine assays.
Clin Biochem. 1998 Apr;31(3):159-63. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(98)00007-1.
4
Development of an Abbott ARCHITECT cyclosporine immunoassay without metabolite cross-reactivity.
Clin Biochem. 2010 Sep;43(13-14):1152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
8
Monitoring cyclosporine of pre-dose and post-dose samples using nonextraction homogeneous immunoassay.
Ther Drug Monit. 2004 Feb;26(1):58-67. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200402000-00013.
9
Evaluation of 2 immunoassays for monitoring low blood levels of tacrolimus.
Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Apr;31(2):273-6. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318196dfed.
10
Determination of ciclosporin A and its six main metabolites in isolated T-lymphocytes and whole blood using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007 Jun 1;852(1-2):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.01.039. Epub 2007 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay.
Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Apr;31(2):198-204. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31819c6a37.
4
Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine.
Transplant Proc. 2004 Mar;36(2 Suppl):396S-403S. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.013.
5
Lack of specificity of cyclosporine immunoassays. Results of a College of American Pathologists Study.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Jan;127(1):19-22. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-19-LOSOC.
6
Cyclosporin: revisions in monitoring guidelines and review of current analytical methods.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2002 Sep;39(Pt 5):424-35. doi: 10.1258/000456302320314430.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验