Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Apr;32(2):145-51. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181d46386.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Abbott ARCHITECT Cyclosporine (CsA) immunoassay in 7 clinical laboratories in comparison to liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), Abbott TDx, Cobas Integra 800, and the Dade Dimension Xpand immunoassay. The ARCHITECT assay uses a whole blood specimen, a pretreatment step with organic reagents to precipitate proteins and extract the drug, followed by a 2-step automated immunoassay with magnetic microparticles coated with anti-CsA antibody and an acridinium-CsA tracer. Imprecision testing at the 7 evaluation sites gave a range of total % coefficient of variations of 7.5%-12.2% at 87.5 ng/mL, 6.6%-14.3% at 411 ng/mL, and 5.2%-10.7% at 916 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification ranged from 12 to 20 ng/mL. Purified CsA metabolites AM1, AM1c, AM4N, AM9, and AM19 were tested in whole blood by the ARCHITECT assay and showed minimal cross-reactivity at all 7 sites. In particular, AM1 and AM9 cross-reactivity in the ARCHITECT assay, ranged from -2.5% to 0.2% and -0.8% to 2.2%, respectively, and was significantly lower than for the TDx assay, in which the values were 3.2% and 16.1%, respectively. Comparable testing of metabolites in the Dade Dimension Xpand assay at 2 evaluation sites showed cross-reactivity to AM4N (6.4% and 6.8%) and AM9 (2.6% and 3.6%) and testing on the Roche Integra 800 showed cross-reactivity to AM1c (2.4%), AM9 (10.7%), and AM19 (2.8%). Cyclosporine International Proficiency Testing Scheme samples, consisting of both pooled specimens from patients receiving CsA therapy as well as whole-blood specimens supplemented with CsA, were tested by the ARCHITECT assay at 6 sites and showed an average bias of -24 to -58 ng/mL versus LC/MSMS CsA and -2 to -37 ng/mL versus AxSYM CsA. Studies were performed with the ARCHITECT CsA assay on patient specimens with the following results: ARCHITECT CsA assay versus LC/MSMS, average bias of 31 ng/mL; ARCHITECT versus the Dade Dimension assay (4 sites), average biases of -7 to -228 ng/mL; ARCHITECT versus AxSYM and TDx, average biases of -4 and -53 ng/mL, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients were >or=0.89. The ARCHITECT CsA assay has significantly reduced CsA metabolite interference relative to other immunoassays and is a convenient and sensitive semiautomated method to measure CsA in whole blood.
本研究的目的是评估 Abbott ARCHITECT 环孢素 (CsA) 免疫分析在 7 个临床实验室中的分析性能,与液相色谱/串联质谱 (LC/MS/MS)、Abbott TDx、Cobas Integra 800 和 Dade Dimension Xpand 免疫分析进行比较。ARCHITECT 分析采用全血标本,用有机试剂进行预处理步骤以沉淀蛋白质并提取药物,然后进行两步自动化免疫分析,使用包被有抗 CsA 抗体的磁性微球和吖啶标记的 CsA 示踪剂。在 7 个评估点进行精密度测试时,在 87.5ng/mL 时总变异系数为 7.5%-12.2%,在 411ng/mL 时为 6.6%-14.3%,在 916ng/mL 时为 5.2%-10.7%。定量下限范围为 12 至 20ng/mL。用 ARCHITECT 分析测试全血中的纯化 CsA 代谢物 AM1、AM1c、AM4N、AM9 和 AM19,在所有 7 个地点均显示出最小的交叉反应性。特别是,ARCHITECT 分析中 AM1 和 AM9 的交叉反应性分别为-2.5%至 0.2%和-0.8%至 2.2%,明显低于 TDx 分析中的 3.2%和 16.1%。在 2 个评估点对 Dade Dimension Xpand 分析中的代谢物进行类似测试,显示对 AM4N(6.4%和 6.8%)和 AM9(2.6%和 3.6%)的交叉反应性,在 Roche Integra 800 上进行测试显示对 AM1c(2.4%)、AM9(10.7%)和 AM19(2.8%)的交叉反应性。CsA 国际能力测试计划样本由接受 CsA 治疗的患者的混合标本以及添加 CsA 的全血标本组成,在 6 个地点用 ARCHITECT 分析进行测试,与 LC/MSMS CsA 相比平均偏差为-24 至-58ng/mL,与 AxSYM CsA 相比平均偏差为-2 至-37ng/mL。使用 ARCHITECT CsA 分析在患者标本上进行了研究,结果如下:ARCHITECT CsA 分析与 LC/MSMS 相比,平均偏差为 31ng/mL;ARCHITECT 与 Dade Dimension 分析(4 个地点)相比,平均偏差为-7 至-228ng/mL;ARCHITECT 与 AxSYM 和 TDx 相比,平均偏差分别为-4 和-53ng/mL。Spearman 相关系数> = 0.89。ARCHITECT CsA 分析与其他免疫分析相比,显著减少了 CsA 代谢物的干扰,是一种方便、敏感的半自动化方法,可用于测量全血中的 CsA。