• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同喷雾技术下观赏植物苗圃中的脱靶损失。

Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.

作者信息

Zhu H, Derksen R C, Krause C R, Zondag R H

机构信息

USDA/ARS Application Technology Research Unit, Wooster, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):25-36.

PMID:20218508
Abstract

Information is lacking on spray techniques to reduce off-target loss on the ground and via spray drift from the treated area in nursery applications. Airborne deposits at three elevations on sampling towers and on the ground at several distances from the sprayer were investigated with the three spray treatments in an open field without crops. Tests were conducted with an air blast sprayer equipped with conventional hollow cone nozzles (HC), low drift nozzles (AI), and conventional hollow cone nozzles with a drift retardant (HCDR) in an open field without crops. To compare field test results, wind tunnel experiments were conducted to assess spray deposits on the floor beyond 0.4 m downwind distance from the nozzles and airborne deposits at 2.1 m downwind from the spray discharge point with the three spray techniques. Droplet size distributions across spray patterns were measured with a laser particle/droplet image analysis system. There was no significant difference in airborne deposits for the three elevations at both 15 and 30 m downwind from the sprayer between AI and HC methods except for 3.05 m elevation at the 15 m distance although the average airborne deposits with AI were lower than that with HC. The downwind spray deposits on the ground at 15 and 30 m from the sprayer with AI were higher than that with HC and HCDR. Compared with conventional hollow cone nozzles, drift reduction from air induction nozzles or the spray mixture with drift retardant was significant in wind tunnel tests but was not significant in field tests.

摘要

关于在苗圃应用中减少地面非靶标损失以及通过喷雾漂移从处理区域造成的非靶标损失的喷雾技术,目前信息匮乏。在没有作物的开阔田地里,采用三种喷雾处理方式,对采样塔三个高度以及距喷雾器不同距离处地面上的空中沉积物进行了研究。使用配备常规空心锥喷嘴(HC)、低漂移喷嘴(AI)和带有漂移抑制剂的常规空心锥喷嘴(HCDR)的风送式喷雾器,在没有作物的开阔田地里进行了试验。为了比较田间试验结果,进行了风洞试验,以评估三种喷雾技术在距喷嘴顺风距离0.4米以外的地面上的喷雾沉积物以及在喷雾排放点顺风2.1米处的空中沉积物。使用激光粒子/液滴图像分析系统测量了整个喷雾模式下的液滴尺寸分布。在距喷雾器顺风15米和30米处,除了15米距离处3.05米高度外,AI和HC方法在三个高度处的空中沉积物没有显著差异,尽管AI的平均空中沉积物低于HC。在距喷雾器顺风15米和30米处,地面上AI的顺风喷雾沉积物高于HC和HCDR。与常规空心锥喷嘴相比,在风洞试验中,空气诱导喷嘴或带有漂移抑制剂的喷雾混合物减少漂移效果显著,但在田间试验中不显著。

相似文献

1
Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.不同喷雾技术下观赏植物苗圃中的脱靶损失。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):25-36.
2
Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.夹带空气和初始液滴速度对高斯喷雾漂移模型释放高度参数的影响。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(2 Pt A):197-200.
3
Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.使用RTDrift高斯平流扩散模型评估实时喷雾漂移。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):11-24.
4
Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.基于液滴尺寸分布和风洞试验的喷雾喷嘴分类
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(2 Pt A):201-7.
5
Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.直接和间接漂移评估方法。第2部分:风洞试验。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):757-61.
6
The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.气流辅助对雾滴特性及喷雾飘移的影响。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2007;72(2):71-9.
7
Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.直接和间接漂移评估方法。第3部分:田间漂移试验。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):763-7.
8
Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 1: PDPA laser based droplet characterisation.直接和间接漂移评估方法。第1部分:基于PDPA激光的液滴特性分析。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):749-56.
9
Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.直接和间接漂移评估方法。第4部分:一项比较研究。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):769-74.
10
Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.喷雾飘移收集器的比较。风洞实验和田间测量。
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Jun;67(6):725-33. doi: 10.1002/ps.2115. Epub 2011 Mar 28.