School of Engineering & Computing, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
J Interprof Care. 2010 Sep;24(5):549-64. doi: 10.3109/13561820903520369.
This study made use of a controlled longitudinal design to assess the impact on pre-registration health and social care students of an interprofessional intervention on the attitudes to and perceptions of interprofessional ideals. Evaluation, over four years, of Nursing, Occupational Therapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Physiotherapy and Radiography students was performed using the adapted versions of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS). Baseline samples of the control and experimental groups were 260 and 313 respectively. Support for Interprofessional Education (IPE) appears high but possibly idealistically so initially. Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) models were used to assess intervention effects as well as any possible profession or time effects. The intervention was found to have had a significant effect on five of the measured sub-scales and the professions were found to react in a significantly different way on four of the sub-scales. The inclusion of a control group has confirmed previous findings from other studies but also highlights the possible effects of the general learning and teaching methodologies employed within various professions as well as the need for research into the influence of the timing, duration, style and content of clinical placement periods.
本研究采用对照纵向设计,评估了一项针对注册前卫生和社会保健学生的跨专业干预措施对其对跨专业理想的态度和看法的影响。使用经过改编的准备跨专业学习量表(RIPLS)和跨学科教育感知量表(IEPS),对护理、职业治疗、足病学、假肢和矫形、物理治疗和放射治疗学生进行了四年的评估。对照组和实验组的基线样本分别为 260 人和 313 人。对跨专业教育(IPE)的支持似乎很高,但最初可能过于理想化。最大似然估计(REML)模型用于评估干预效果以及任何可能的专业或时间效果。研究发现,该干预措施对五个测量子量表有显著影响,而且四个子量表的专业反应方式也有显著差异。包含对照组证实了其他研究的先前发现,但也强调了各种专业内普遍采用的学习和教学方法的可能影响,以及需要研究临床实习期间的时间、持续时间、方式和内容的影响。