Suppr超能文献

穿透性腹部创伤选择性非手术治疗的实践管理指南

Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Como John J, Bokhari Faran, Chiu William C, Duane Therese M, Holevar Michele R, Tandoh Margaret A, Ivatury Rao R, Scalea Thomas M

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Burns, Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):721-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cf7d07.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Although there is no debate that patients with peritonitis or hemodynamic instability should undergo urgent laparotomy after penetrating injury to the abdomen, it is also clear that certain stable patients without peritonitis may be managed without operation. The practice of deciding which patients may not need surgery after penetrating abdominal wounds has been termed selective management. This practice has been readily accepted during the past few decades with regard to abdominal stab wounds; however, controversy persists regarding gunshot wounds. Because of this, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to develop guidelines to analyze which patients may be managed safely without laparotomy after penetrating abdominal trauma. A secondary goal of this committee was to find which diagnostic adjuncts are useful in the determination of the need for surgical exploration.

METHODS

: A search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov).

RESULTS

: The search retrieved English language articles concerning selective management of penetrating abdominal trauma and related topics from the years 1960 to 2007. These articles were then used to construct this set of practice management guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

: Although the rate of nontherapeutic laparotomies after penetrating wounds to the abdomen should be minimized, this should never be at the expense of a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of injury. With this in mind, a routine laparotomy is not indicated in hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds without signs of peritonitis or diffuse abdominal tenderness. Likewise, it is also not routinely indicated in stable patients with abdominal gunshot wounds if the wounds are tangential and there are no peritoneal signs. Abdominopelvic computed tomography should be considered in patients selected for initial nonoperative management to facilitate initial management decisions. The majority of patients with penetrating abdominal trauma managed nonoperatively may be discharged after 24 hours of observation in the presence of a reliable abdominal examination and minimal to no abdominal tenderness. Diagnostic laparoscopy may be considered as a tool to evaluate diaphragmatic lacerations and peritoneal penetration in an effort to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.

摘要

背景

虽然对于腹膜炎或血流动力学不稳定的患者在腹部穿透伤后应紧急进行剖腹手术这一点并无争议,但同样明确的是,某些没有腹膜炎的稳定患者可能无需手术治疗。决定哪些腹部穿透伤患者可能不需要手术的做法被称为选择性处理。在过去几十年里,这种做法已被广泛接受用于腹部刺伤;然而,对于枪伤仍存在争议。因此,东部创伤外科学会实践管理指南委员会着手制定指南,以分析哪些腹部穿透伤患者在不进行剖腹手术的情况下可以安全处理。该委员会的第二个目标是找出哪些诊断辅助手段有助于确定是否需要进行手术探查。

方法

使用PubMed(www.pubmed.gov)对美国国立医学图书馆和国立卫生研究院的MEDLINE数据库进行检索。

结果

检索到了1960年至2007年有关腹部穿透伤选择性处理及相关主题的英文文章。然后利用这些文章构建了这一套实践管理指南。

结论

虽然应尽量减少腹部穿透伤后非治疗性剖腹手术的发生率,但绝不能以延误损伤的诊断和治疗为代价。考虑到这一点,对于没有腹膜炎体征或弥漫性腹部压痛的血流动力学稳定的腹部刺伤患者,不建议进行常规剖腹手术。同样,如果伤口为切线伤且没有腹膜体征,对于稳定的腹部枪伤患者也不常规建议进行剖腹手术。对于选择初始非手术治疗的患者,应考虑进行腹盆腔计算机断层扫描,以利于做出初始治疗决策。大多数接受非手术治疗的腹部穿透伤患者在经过24小时观察且腹部检查可靠、腹部压痛轻微或无压痛的情况下可以出院。诊断性腹腔镜检查可被视为一种评估膈肌裂伤和腹膜穿透情况的工具,以避免不必要的剖腹手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验