Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;18(7):634-42. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cabad1.
Clinical depression in the elderly is associated with cerebral small vessel disease. It is less certain whether the endorsement of depressive symptoms in the absence of clinical depression, relatively common in euthymic older adults, is also associated with white matter damage. The majority of studies exploring this issue have produced mixed results, perhaps due, in part, to differences in defining the threshold for depression, notating vascular risk factors, and/or the neuroimaging tools used to quantify white matter damage. We aimed to address these issues with non-demented euthymic older adults.
We performed diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a population based cohort of 79 individuals (mean age = 68 years).
In addition to neuroimaging, the authors report assessments of overall cognition, executive functioning, and depression.
Scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item (GDS-15) correlated with DTI measures of mean diffusivity (r [77] = 0.23, p = 0.039) and fractional anisotropy (r [77] = -0.22, p = 0.045) but only approached significance for T2-weighted MRI measures of white matter hyperintensities (WMH; r [77] = 0.21, p = 0.053). After adjusting for factors known to influence the development of WMH and depression, including age and vascular risks, DTI-derived indices of white matter integrity remained significantly associated with GDS-15 scores. Furthermore, only DTI-derived measures of white matter integrity contributed to the variance in GDS-15 scores in logistical regression modeling.
These findings demonstrate an association between white matter damage and the endorsement of depressive symptoms in euthymic older adults and suggest that DTI may be more sensitive to this damage than T2-WMH in an aging cohort with multiple vascular risk factors.
老年人的临床抑郁症与脑小血管疾病有关。然而,在情绪稳定的老年人群中,较为常见的无临床抑郁症但存在抑郁症状的情况是否也与白质损伤有关,这一点尚不确定。大多数研究这一问题的结果都存在差异,这可能部分归因于抑郁症阈值的定义、血管危险因素的记录以及用于量化白质损伤的神经影像学工具的差异。我们旨在针对无痴呆的情绪稳定的老年人群解决这些问题。
我们对一个基于人群的 79 名个体(平均年龄=68 岁)队列进行了弥散张量成像(DTI)和 T2 加权磁共振成像(MRI)检查。
除了神经影像学检查外,作者还报告了对整体认知、执行功能和抑郁的评估。
老年抑郁量表 15 项(GDS-15)的评分与 DTI 测量的平均弥散度(r [77] = 0.23,p = 0.039)和各向异性分数(r [77] = -0.22,p = 0.045)相关,但与 T2 加权 MRI 测量的白质高信号(WMH;r [77] = 0.21,p = 0.053)仅接近显著相关。在校正已知影响 WMH 和抑郁发展的因素,包括年龄和血管风险后,DTI 衍生的白质完整性指数仍与 GDS-15 评分显著相关。此外,在逻辑回归模型中,只有 DTI 衍生的白质完整性测量对白质高信号评分的变化有贡献。
这些发现表明,在情绪稳定的老年人群中,白质损伤与抑郁症状的出现之间存在关联,并且在存在多种血管风险因素的老龄化队列中,DTI 可能比 T2-WMH 更敏感地反映这种损伤。