Breivik Harald, Norum Hilde M
Institutt for sykehusmedisin, Universitetet i Oslo og Akuttklinikken, Anestesi Oslo universitetssykehus, Rikshospitalet 0027 Oslo, Norway.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Feb 25;130(4):392-7. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0220.
BACKGROUND: Local anaesthetics may alleviate pain more effectively than any other anaesthetic method. In regional anaesthesia/analgesia, rare but serious complications make it necessary to always consider the risk-benefit ratio. The article discusses these issues and gives advice on effective and safe conduct. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The article is based on non-systematic literature searches in the PubMed and Cochrane databases and our own experience from research and clinical work. RESULTS: Regional anaesthesia is obtained by administering local anaesthetics near the spinal cord and nerve roots (spinal, epidural), spinal nerves (paravertebral), or close to peripheral nerves. Parts of the body will then become numb and paralysed. The same techniques are used for regional analgesia, but this is obtained by using more dilute solutions of local anaesthetics, and other analgesic drugs are often added. Pain impulses are inhibited, but sensation of touch and muscle functions are intact. Regional analgesia gives superior relief of pain provoked by movement. This facilitates early postoperative mobilization of patients, even after major surgery in weak patients. For these patients optimally performed regional analgesia may reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality better than general anaesthesia and opioid and non-opioid analgesics administered postoperatively. Infiltration of the wound with local anaesthetics followed by optimally dosed non-opioid and opioid analgesics is a good alternative for some types of surgery. The risk of spinal bleeding has increased due to increased patient age, routine thromboprophylaxis and frequent use of antihaemostatic drugs, including platelet inhibitors. Infections in the spinal cord are caused by insufficient hygiene. Selection of patients who are likely to benefit from regional anaesthesia/analgesia, strict hygienic precautions, optimal technique, close monitoring, and assistance from an acute pain team, as well as hospital protocols for handling rare but serious complications, have reduced the occurrence and consequences of serious complications. INTERPRETATION: Optimal regional anaesthesia/analgesia may improve the postoperative result.
背景:局部麻醉可能比其他任何麻醉方法都能更有效地缓解疼痛。在区域麻醉/镇痛中,尽管罕见但严重的并发症使得必须始终考虑风险效益比。本文讨论了这些问题,并就有效且安全的操作提供了建议。 材料与方法:本文基于在PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行的非系统性文献检索以及我们在研究和临床工作中的自身经验。 结果:通过在脊髓和神经根附近(脊髓、硬膜外)、脊神经(椎旁)或靠近周围神经处给予局部麻醉药来实现区域麻醉。身体的某些部位随后会变得麻木和麻痹。相同的技术用于区域镇痛,但这是通过使用更稀释的局部麻醉药溶液来实现的,并且通常会添加其他镇痛药。疼痛冲动受到抑制,但触觉和肌肉功能保持完好。区域镇痛能更好地缓解因运动引起的疼痛。这有利于患者术后早期活动,即使是身体虚弱的患者接受大手术后也是如此。对于这些患者,最佳实施的区域镇痛可能比全身麻醉以及术后使用的阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药更能降低术后发病率和死亡率。对于某些类型的手术,用局部麻醉药浸润伤口,随后给予最佳剂量的非阿片类和阿片类镇痛药是一个不错的选择。由于患者年龄增加、常规血栓预防以及频繁使用包括血小板抑制剂在内的止血药物,脊髓出血的风险有所增加。脊髓感染是由卫生措施不足引起的。选择可能从区域麻醉/镇痛中获益的患者、严格的卫生预防措施、最佳技术、密切监测、急性疼痛团队的协助以及医院处理罕见但严重并发症的方案,已经减少了严重并发症的发生及其后果。 解读:最佳的区域麻醉/镇痛可能改善术后结果。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010-2-25
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010-2-25
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2002
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006-10
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006-10
Dan Med Bull. 2003-8
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998-4-30
World J Clin Cases. 2022-4-6