Suppr超能文献

初始间隔时长对区别性强化零反应(DRO)程序效果的影响。

The effects of initial interval size on the efficacy of DRO schedules of reinforcement.

作者信息

Repp A C, Felce D, Barton L E

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb 60115.

出版信息

Except Child. 1991 Mar-Apr;57(5):417-25. doi: 10.1177/001440299105700505.

Abstract

The differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) is a behavior-reduction procedure that has been popular for several years. In classroom settings, it provides reinforcement when a student does not display inappropriate responding for a particular interval of time. Unfortunately, relatively little is known about how to use DRO effectively in applied settings. Most research has been conducted in laboratory settings; the purpose of the present study was to provide a replication of one of those studies. This study examined the effect of the size of the initial DRO interval on the disruptive behavior of students with moderate disabilities. In the first experiment, a group of six students was observed during baseline in two classes. Two different DRO values were then used. In one classroom, it was equal to the mean number of 10-second intervals between disruptions during baseline. In the other classroom, it was twice the mean number during baseline. In the final phase, behavior in both classrooms was put under the same DRO program. In the second experiment, the disruptive behavior of three students was studied in a different design in which both methods of determining the initial DRO value were compared. The results of both experiments showed that an initial DRO value equal to the mean number of intervals between responses in baseline was much more effective than a value twice that size in reducing disruptions.

摘要

对其他行为的差别强化(DRO)是一种已流行数年的行为减少程序。在课堂环境中,当学生在特定时间段内未表现出不适当反应时,它会给予强化。不幸的是,对于如何在应用环境中有效使用DRO,人们了解得相对较少。大多数研究是在实验室环境中进行的;本研究的目的是对其中一项研究进行重复。这项研究考察了初始DRO间隔时长对中度残疾学生破坏性行为的影响。在第一个实验中,对一组六名学生在两个班级的基线期进行观察。然后使用了两个不同的DRO值。在一个教室中,它等于基线期破坏行为之间10秒间隔的平均数。在另一个教室中,它是基线期平均数的两倍。在最后阶段,两个教室的行为都置于相同的DRO程序之下。在第二个实验中,以不同的设计研究了三名学生的破坏性行为,其中对确定初始DRO值的两种方法进行了比较。两个实验的结果均表明,初始DRO值等于基线期反应间隔的平均数,在减少破坏行为方面比该数值两倍大小的效果要好得多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验