Venditti T, Angiolino C, Dore A, Molinu M G, Petretto A, D'Hallewin G
C.N.R.-ISPA, Traversa La Crucca 3, IT-07040 Sassari, Italy.
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(3):723-8.
Citrus fruit are susceptible to many postharvest diseases and disorders, but Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum are the most common and serious pathogens during storage and marketing. The continuous employ in packing houses of synthetic fungicides such as imazalil (IMZ) or thiabendazote for the control of these pathogens is promoting the selection of resistant biotypes. These considerations together with an increased attention for human health and the environment have multiplied the studies on new ecological technologies. In recent years researchers studies focused on alternatives to the chemical control of post-harvest decay, such as the utilization of GRAS compounds as well as physical methods. In the present study is reported the sequential use of acetic acid (AAC) followed by curing. The lemon variety "Verna" and the orange variety "Jaffa", naturally inoculated, were treated with vapours of AAC performed at three different concentration (15, 25 and 50 microL/L) for 15 minutes, after an incubation period of 24 hours at 27 degrees C and 90% relative humidity (RH). After treatments fruits were cured at 36 degrees C for 36 hours with 90% RH and subsequently stored at 8 degrees C and 90% of RH for eight weeks. Both citrus varieties were also treated with IMZ at a concentration of 200 mL/HL. At the end of the experiment decay and weight loss were evaluated. After 8 weeks of storage, in the lemon variety, the lowest percentage of infected wounds was 1.5% for both the fruit treated with IMZ or with AAC at 25 microL/L. Fruit treated with 15 mciroL/L or untreated (control) showed similar results with 13.6% and 16.6% of rotted fruit respectively. Different results were obtained with the orange variety, in this case the synthetic fungicide was the most effective at the end of the storage period, with 18.0% of decay. AAC treatments were not a successful as on lemons, the best result was achieved even in this case with AAC performed at 25 pL/L, but with 39.9% of decay. In both species the weight loss was not affected by the treatments. These results show that a good control of postharvest decay could be achieved, on lemon fruit, by combining the effect of a GRAS compound such as AAC with curing. Conversely the results obtained, by applying this control method to the orange variety were not so promising. Further researches are needed to shed light on the different behaviour between the two species.
柑橘类水果易患多种采后病害和失调症,但指状青霉和意大利青霉是贮藏和销售期间最常见且最严重的病原体。在包装厂持续使用合成杀菌剂如抑霉唑(IMZ)或噻菌灵来控制这些病原体,正在促使抗性生物型的产生。这些因素,再加上对人类健康和环境的日益关注,使得关于新生态技术的研究成倍增加。近年来,研究人员的研究集中在采后腐烂化学防治的替代方法上,比如使用公认安全的化合物以及物理方法。在本研究中,报告了乙酸(AAC)随后进行愈伤处理的顺序使用情况。对自然接种的柠檬品种“韦尔纳”和橙子品种“雅法”,在27℃和90%相对湿度(RH)下培养24小时后,用三种不同浓度(15、25和50微升/升)的AAC蒸汽处理15分钟。处理后,果实在36℃和90%RH下进行36小时的愈伤处理,随后在8℃和90%RH下贮藏8周。两个柑橘品种也用浓度为200毫升/百升的IMZ进行处理。在实验结束时,评估腐烂情况和重量损失。贮藏8周后,在柠檬品种中,用IMZ或25微升/升的AAC处理的果实,感染伤口的最低百分比为1.5%。用15微升/升处理或未处理(对照)的果实显示出相似的结果,腐烂果实分别为13.6%和16.6%。橙子品种得到了不同结果,在这种情况下,合成杀菌剂在贮藏期结束时最有效,腐烂率为18.0%。AAC处理不像对柠檬那样成功,即使在这种情况下,25微升/升的AAC处理取得了最好结果,但腐烂率为39.9%。在两个品种中,重量损失均不受处理影响。这些结果表明,通过将AAC等公认安全的化合物的作用与愈伤处理相结合,可以很好地控制柠檬果实的采后腐烂。相反,将这种防治方法应用于橙子品种所得到的结果并不那么乐观。需要进一步研究以阐明两个品种之间的不同表现。