Scott & White Healthcare and Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2401 S 31st Street CDM, Temple, TX 76508, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Nov;81(2):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.018. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
This study tested the efficacy of a patient engagement intervention for older adults with multiple chronic illnesses.
Seventy-nine participants were randomly assigned to receive the intervention (Intervention Group), contacts on a different topic (Safety Group), or Usual Care. The Intervention and Safety Groups attended a 2-h workshop and participated in phone calls; one before and one after a naturally-occurring medical encounter. The Intervention Group discussed patient engagement concepts from publicly distributed content. The Safety Group discussed general safety (e.g., fire safety, identity theft). Self-report measures were gathered by telephone interview at Baseline and 6-months following Baseline.
We did not find expected improvements in patient activation and health-related quality of life. However, the Intervention Group was the only group to show a statistically significant improvement in self-efficacy for self-management.
The intervention shows promise for improving quality of life and/or health, but requires refinement to reach persons not already engaged in their healthcare and to strengthen its effects.
Patient-directed skills training interventions may be a successful way to support clinicians' and others' efforts to encourage older patients to be actively involved in their care.
本研究旨在测试一种针对患有多种慢性病的老年人的患者参与干预措施的疗效。
79 名参与者被随机分配接受干预(干预组)、接受不同主题的联系(安全组)或常规护理。干预组和安全组参加了 2 小时的研讨会,并进行了电话联系;一次是在自然发生的医疗事件之前,一次是在之后。干预组讨论了从公开分发的内容中获得的患者参与概念。安全组讨论了一般安全(如消防安全、身份盗窃)。通过电话访谈在基线和基线后 6 个月收集自我报告措施。
我们没有发现患者激活和与健康相关的生活质量的预期改善。然而,干预组是唯一显示自我管理自我效能感有统计学意义改善的组。
该干预措施有望改善生活质量和/或健康,但需要改进,以覆盖那些尚未参与其医疗保健的人群,并加强其效果。
面向患者的技能培训干预措施可能是支持临床医生和其他人努力鼓励老年患者积极参与其护理的一种成功方法。