Suppr超能文献

供者种族对已故供体非裔美国人肾移植受者仍有影响吗?

Does donor race still make a difference in deceased-donor African-American renal allograft recipients?

机构信息

Section of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, and Pharmacy Department, Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2010 Mar;199(3):305-9; discussion 309. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have demonstrated that African-American (AA) donor kidneys are independently associated with an increased risk for graft loss.

METHODS

We examined outcomes in comparable groups of AA deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplant patients receiving an AA donor (n=35) versus a Caucasian donor (C group; n=150) organ.

RESULTS

There were no differences between AA and C groups in patient survival, new-onset diabetes, or BK nephropathy. The AA group demonstrated a significantly higher 6-month and overall incidence of acute rejection (AR), increased cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and decreased graft survival. Recurrent or de novo focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) accounted for a significantly higher fraction of graft losses in the AA versus C group.

CONCLUSIONS

AA DD renal allograft recipients have equivalent patient but decreased graft survival when transplanted with an AA versus C kidney using current immunosuppression. This may be the result of increased AR, CMV infection, and recurrence/development of FSGS.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,非裔美国人(AA)供体肾脏与移植物丢失的风险增加独立相关。

方法

我们比较了接受 AA 供体(n=35)和白人供体(C 组;n=150)器官的 AA 死亡供体(DD)肾移植患者的结果。

结果

AA 组和 C 组在患者存活率、新发糖尿病或 BK 肾病方面无差异。AA 组在 6 个月和整体急性排斥反应(AR)、巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的发生率较高,移植物存活率较低。复发性或新发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化症(FSGS)在 AA 组中的移植物丢失比例明显高于 C 组。

结论

在当前免疫抑制下,与接受 C 肾移植相比,AA DD 肾移植受者的患者存活率相当,但移植物存活率降低。这可能是由于 AR、CMV 感染和 FSGS 的复发/发展所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验