Suppr超能文献

英国肾移植术后的种族匹配与结果。

Ethnicity matching and outcomes after kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0195038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195038. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kidneys from non-white donors have inferior outcomes, but it is unclear if ethnicity matching between donors and recipients achieves better post kidney transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective, population cohort study utilising UK Transplant Registry data. The cohort comprised adult, kidney-alone, transplant recipients receiving their first kidney transplant between 2003-2015, with data censored at 1st October 2016. We included 27,970 recipients stratified into white (n = 23,215), black (n = 1,679) and south Asian (n = 3,076) ethnicity, with median post-transplant follow-up of 1,676 days (IQR 716-2,869 days). Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression survival analyses were performed to investigate ethnicity effect on risk for graft loss and mortality.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analyses, matched ethnicity between donors-recipients resulted in better outcomes for delayed graft function, one-year creatinine, graft and patient survival but these differed by ethnicity matches. Compared to white-to-white transplants, risk for death-censored graft loss was higher in black-to-black and similar among Asian-to-Asian transplants, but mortality risk was lower for both black-to-black and Asian-to-Asian transplants. In Cox regression models, compared to white donors, we observed higher risk for graft loss with both south Asian (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12-1.70, p = 0.003) and black (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.30-2.11, p<0.001) donated kidneys independent of recipient ethnicity. We observed no mortality difference with south Asian donated kidneys but increased mortality with black donated kidneys (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.21-2.35, p = 0.002). Matching ethnicities made no significant difference in any Cox regression model. Similar results were observed after stratifying our analysis by living and deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm inferior outcomes associated with non-white kidney donors for kidney transplant recipients of any ethnicity in a risk-adjusted model for the United Kingdom population. However, contrary to non-renal transplant literature, we did not identify any survival benefits associated with donor-recipient ethnicity matching.

摘要

背景

非白人供体的肾脏移植效果较差,但尚不清楚供体和受者之间的种族匹配是否能改善肾移植后的效果。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性的、基于人群的队列研究,利用英国移植登记处的数据。该队列包括 2003 年至 2015 年间接受首次肾移植的成年、单独肾移植受者,数据截止日期为 2016 年 10 月 1 日。我们将 27970 名受者分为白人(n=23215)、黑人(n=1679)和南亚人(n=3076),中位移植后随访时间为 1676 天(IQR 716-2869 天)。我们进行了未调整和调整后的 Cox 回归生存分析,以研究种族对移植物丢失和死亡率的影响。

结果

在未调整分析中,供者-受者之间的匹配种族对延迟移植物功能、1 年肌酐、移植物和患者生存率有更好的结果,但这些结果因种族匹配而有所不同。与白人-白人移植相比,黑人-黑人和亚洲-亚洲移植的死亡相关移植物丢失风险更高,但黑人-黑人和亚洲-亚洲移植的死亡率较低。在 Cox 回归模型中,与白人供者相比,我们观察到南亚供者(HR 1.38,95%CI 1.12-1.70,p=0.003)和黑人供者(HR 1.66,95%CI 1.30-2.11,p<0.001)的移植物丢失风险更高,而与受者的种族无关。我们没有观察到南亚供肾的死亡率差异,但观察到黑种人供肾的死亡率增加(HR 1.68,95%CI 1.21-2.35,p=0.002)。在任何 Cox 回归模型中,匹配种族都没有显著差异。在对活体和已故供体肾移植的分析进行分层后,也观察到了类似的结果。

结论

在调整了英国人群风险因素的模型中,我们的数据证实了非白人供体的肾脏移植效果较差,与任何种族的肾移植受者相关。然而,与非肾脏移植文献不同的是,我们没有发现任何与供者-受者种族匹配相关的生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/029e/5898720/dd37b54779dc/pone.0195038.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验