Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0195038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195038. eCollection 2018.
Kidneys from non-white donors have inferior outcomes, but it is unclear if ethnicity matching between donors and recipients achieves better post kidney transplant outcomes.
We undertook a retrospective, population cohort study utilising UK Transplant Registry data. The cohort comprised adult, kidney-alone, transplant recipients receiving their first kidney transplant between 2003-2015, with data censored at 1st October 2016. We included 27,970 recipients stratified into white (n = 23,215), black (n = 1,679) and south Asian (n = 3,076) ethnicity, with median post-transplant follow-up of 1,676 days (IQR 716-2,869 days). Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression survival analyses were performed to investigate ethnicity effect on risk for graft loss and mortality.
In unadjusted analyses, matched ethnicity between donors-recipients resulted in better outcomes for delayed graft function, one-year creatinine, graft and patient survival but these differed by ethnicity matches. Compared to white-to-white transplants, risk for death-censored graft loss was higher in black-to-black and similar among Asian-to-Asian transplants, but mortality risk was lower for both black-to-black and Asian-to-Asian transplants. In Cox regression models, compared to white donors, we observed higher risk for graft loss with both south Asian (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12-1.70, p = 0.003) and black (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.30-2.11, p<0.001) donated kidneys independent of recipient ethnicity. We observed no mortality difference with south Asian donated kidneys but increased mortality with black donated kidneys (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.21-2.35, p = 0.002). Matching ethnicities made no significant difference in any Cox regression model. Similar results were observed after stratifying our analysis by living and deceased-donor kidney transplantation.
Our data confirm inferior outcomes associated with non-white kidney donors for kidney transplant recipients of any ethnicity in a risk-adjusted model for the United Kingdom population. However, contrary to non-renal transplant literature, we did not identify any survival benefits associated with donor-recipient ethnicity matching.
非白人供体的肾脏移植效果较差,但尚不清楚供体和受者之间的种族匹配是否能改善肾移植后的效果。
我们进行了一项回顾性的、基于人群的队列研究,利用英国移植登记处的数据。该队列包括 2003 年至 2015 年间接受首次肾移植的成年、单独肾移植受者,数据截止日期为 2016 年 10 月 1 日。我们将 27970 名受者分为白人(n=23215)、黑人(n=1679)和南亚人(n=3076),中位移植后随访时间为 1676 天(IQR 716-2869 天)。我们进行了未调整和调整后的 Cox 回归生存分析,以研究种族对移植物丢失和死亡率的影响。
在未调整分析中,供者-受者之间的匹配种族对延迟移植物功能、1 年肌酐、移植物和患者生存率有更好的结果,但这些结果因种族匹配而有所不同。与白人-白人移植相比,黑人-黑人和亚洲-亚洲移植的死亡相关移植物丢失风险更高,但黑人-黑人和亚洲-亚洲移植的死亡率较低。在 Cox 回归模型中,与白人供者相比,我们观察到南亚供者(HR 1.38,95%CI 1.12-1.70,p=0.003)和黑人供者(HR 1.66,95%CI 1.30-2.11,p<0.001)的移植物丢失风险更高,而与受者的种族无关。我们没有观察到南亚供肾的死亡率差异,但观察到黑种人供肾的死亡率增加(HR 1.68,95%CI 1.21-2.35,p=0.002)。在任何 Cox 回归模型中,匹配种族都没有显著差异。在对活体和已故供体肾移植的分析进行分层后,也观察到了类似的结果。
在调整了英国人群风险因素的模型中,我们的数据证实了非白人供体的肾脏移植效果较差,与任何种族的肾移植受者相关。然而,与非肾脏移植文献不同的是,我们没有发现任何与供者-受者种族匹配相关的生存获益。