Suppr超能文献

发热性中性粒细胞减少症的抗生素管理:当前进展与未来方向

Antibiotic management of febrile neutropenia: current developments and future directions.

作者信息

Mebis J, Goossens H, Berneman Z N

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem Belgium.

出版信息

J Chemother. 2010 Feb;22(1):5-12. doi: 10.1179/joc.2010.22.1.5.

Abstract

Mortality due to febrile neutropenia has decreased since the concept of empiric therapy became standard care. However, infectious complications remain the most common adverse events of chemotherapy. bacterial epidemiology has changed during the past decades. There is currently an increasing trend in infections due to Gramnegative bacteria which have higher rates of resistance for a variety of reasons.The use of biomarkers for diagnosis remains a domain of further investigation. Since the patient population with febrile neutropenia is very heterogeneous, models of risk assessment have been developed with the most commonly used today being the mASCC score.Oral antibiotic treatment seems to be appropriate in low-risk patients. In moderate or high-risk patients monotherapy is the most common option. However, due to emerging resistance this could change by next year. Some new antibiotics have been developed, but experience in the treatment of neutropenic fever is limited. The use of antibiotics for prophylaxis remains controversial, although recent studies suggest a reduction in death from all causes.

摘要

自从经验性治疗的概念成为标准治疗方法以来,发热性中性粒细胞减少症导致的死亡率有所下降。然而,感染并发症仍然是化疗最常见的不良事件。在过去几十年中,细菌流行病学发生了变化。目前,革兰氏阴性菌引起的感染呈上升趋势,由于多种原因,这些细菌具有较高的耐药率。生物标志物用于诊断仍处于进一步研究阶段。由于发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者群体非常多样化,已经开发了风险评估模型,目前最常用的是mASCC评分。口服抗生素治疗似乎适用于低风险患者。在中度或高风险患者中,单一疗法是最常见的选择。然而,由于新出现的耐药性,这种情况可能在明年发生变化。已经开发了一些新抗生素,但在中性粒细胞减少性发热治疗方面的经验有限。抗生素用于预防仍然存在争议,尽管最近的研究表明全因死亡率有所降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验