N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
It is not known whether drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system reduce the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular events in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we assigned 9306 patients with impaired glucose tolerance and established cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors to receive valsartan (up to 160 mg daily) or placebo (and nateglinide or placebo) in addition to lifestyle modification. We then followed the patients for a median of 5.0 years for the development of diabetes (6.5 years for vital status). We studied the effects of valsartan on the occurrence of three coprimary outcomes: the development of diabetes; an extended composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, arterial revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina; and a core composite outcome that excluded unstable angina and revascularization.
The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 33.1% in the valsartan group, as compared with 36.8% in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the valsartan group, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.92; P<0.001). Valsartan, as compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of either the extended cardiovascular outcome (14.5% vs. 14.8%; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.43) or the core cardiovascular outcome (8.1% vs. 8.1%; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.14; P=0.85).
Among patients with impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular disease or risk factors, the use of valsartan for 5 years, along with lifestyle modification, led to a relative reduction of 14% in the incidence of diabetes but did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097786.)
目前尚不清楚血管紧张素受体阻滞剂是否可以降低糖耐量受损患者发生糖尿病和心血管事件的风险。
在这项采用 2×2 析因设计的双盲、随机临床试验中,我们将 9306 例糖耐量受损且伴有已确立的心血管疾病或心血管危险因素的患者随机分配,接受缬沙坦(剂量高达 160mg/日)或安慰剂治疗(并接受那格列奈或安慰剂治疗),同时进行生活方式的调整。随后,我们中位随访 5.0 年(总随访时间为 6.5 年),以评估患者发生糖尿病的情况。我们研究了缬沙坦对三个主要复合终点事件的影响:发生糖尿病;心血管原因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中和心力衰竭住院、动脉血运重建或不稳定型心绞痛住院等扩展复合终点事件;以及排除不稳定型心绞痛和血运重建的核心复合终点事件。
缬沙坦组的糖尿病累积发生率为 33.1%,而安慰剂组为 36.8%(缬沙坦组的风险比为 0.86;95%置信区间 [CI],0.80 至 0.92;P<0.001)。与安慰剂相比,缬沙坦并未显著降低扩展心血管终点事件(14.5% vs. 14.8%;风险比,0.96;95%CI,0.86 至 1.07;P=0.43)或核心心血管终点事件(8.1% vs. 8.1%;风险比,0.99;95%CI,0.86 至 1.14;P=0.85)的发生率。
在伴有心血管疾病或危险因素的糖耐量受损患者中,5 年缬沙坦治疗联合生活方式调整可使糖尿病发病率相对降低 14%,但并未降低心血管事件的发生率。(临床试验编号,NCT00097786。)