Suppr超能文献

城市女性中,受教育程度不同导致堕胎不平等趋势。

Trends in inequalities in induced abortion according to educational level among urban women.

机构信息

Health Information Systems Service, Barcelona Public Health Agency, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2010 May;87(3):524-30. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9394-z. Epub 2010 Mar 13.

Abstract

This study aims to describe trends in inequalities by women's socioeconomic position and age in induced abortion in Barcelona (Spain) over 1992-1996 and 2000-2004. Induced abortions occurring in residents in Barcelona aged 20 and 44 years in the study period are included. Variables are age, educational level, and time periods. Induced abortion rates per 1,000 women and absolute differences for educational level, age, and time period are calculated. Poisson regression models are fitted to obtain the relative risk (RR) for trends. Induced abortion rates increased from 10.1 to 14.6 per 1,000 women aged 20-44 (RR = 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-1.47) between 1992-1996 and 2000-2004. The abortion rate was highest among women aged 20-24 and 25-34 and changed little among women aged 35-44. Among women aged 20-24 and 25-34, those with a primary education or less had higher rates of induced abortion in the second period. Induced abortion rates also grew in those women with secondary education. In the 35-44 age group, the induced abortion rate declined among women with a secondary education (RR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.73) and slightly among those with a greater level of education. Induced abortion is rising most among women in poor socioeconomic positions. This study reveals deep inequalities in induced abortion in Barcelona, Spain. The trends identified in this study suggest that policy efforts to reduce unintended pregnancies are failing in Spain. Our study fills an important gap in literature on recent trends in Southern Europe.

摘要

本研究旨在描述 1992-1996 年和 2000-2004 年期间巴塞罗那(西班牙)因社会经济地位和年龄而异的女性人工流产不平等趋势。包括研究期间巴塞罗那 20 至 44 岁居民的人工流产。变量是年龄、教育水平和时间段。计算了每 1000 名妇女的人工流产率和教育水平、年龄和时间段的绝对差异。拟合泊松回归模型以获得趋势的相对风险 (RR)。1992-1996 年和 2000-2004 年期间,20-44 岁女性的人工流产率从每 1000 名妇女 10.1 例增加到 14.6 例(RR=1.44;95%置信区间(CI)1.41-1.47)。20-24 岁和 25-34 岁女性的堕胎率最高,而 35-44 岁女性的堕胎率变化不大。在 20-24 岁和 25-34 岁的女性中,受教育程度较低的人在第二阶段人工流产率较高。接受过中等教育的女性人工流产率也有所增加。在 35-44 岁年龄组中,接受过中等教育的女性人工流产率下降(RR=0.66;95%CI 0.60-0.73),受教育程度较高的女性略有下降。社会经济地位较低的女性的人工流产率增长最快。这项研究揭示了巴塞罗那人工流产方面存在严重的不平等现象。本研究中确定的趋势表明,西班牙减少意外怀孕的政策努力失败了。我们的研究填补了南欧近期趋势文献中的一个重要空白。

相似文献

1
Trends in inequalities in induced abortion according to educational level among urban women.
J Urban Health. 2010 May;87(3):524-30. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9394-z. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
2
Trends in socioeconomic mortality inequalities in a southern European urban setting at the turn of the 21st century.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Mar;62(3):258-66. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.057166.
3
Social and economic inequalities in induced abortion in Spain as a function of individual and contextual factors.
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Feb;24(1):162-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt104. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
5
Abortion surveillance--United States, 2009.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Nov 23;61(8):1-44.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.
J Urban Health. 2008 Jan;85(1):125-35. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9233-z. Epub 2007 Nov 24.
7
Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cirrhosis mortality in an urban area of Southern Europe: a multilevel approach.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Aug;64(8):720-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.086538. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
8
Unintended pregnancy in the United States.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46.
10
Induced abortion in Italy: levels, trends and characteristics.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):267-71, 277.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of birthplace and educational attainment on induced abortion inequalities.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3984-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Age at sexual initiation and number of sexual partners in the female Spanish population Results from the AFRODITA survey.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Oct;140(2):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 May 21.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.
J Urban Health. 2008 Jan;85(1):125-35. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9233-z. Epub 2007 Nov 24.
3
Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends.
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007 Sep;33(3):106-16. doi: 10.1363/3310607.
5
Abortion in democratic Spain: the parliamentary political agenda 1979-2004.
Reprod Health Matters. 2007 May;15(29):85-96. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)29295-X.
6
The use of oral contraceptives among Finnish teenagers from 1981 to 2003.
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Nov;39(5):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.022. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
7
Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Jun;38(2):90-6. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.090.06.
8
Abortion rate and contraceptive practices in immigrant and Swedish adolescents.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006 Jun;19(3):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.02.007.
9
[Socioeconomic inequalities in the provision and uptake of prenatal care].
Gac Sanit. 2006 Jan-Feb;20(1):25-30. doi: 10.1157/13084124.
10
Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1).
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jan;60(1):7-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验