South Australiam Instiute of Ophthalmology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, South Australia.
J Refract Surg. 2010 Mar;26(3):197-200. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100224-06. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
To investigate how the refractive outcomes of pairs of eyes are related. Previous evidence suggests altering intraocular lens (IOL) power for the second eye based on the refractive outcomes of the first eye following cataract surgery, which may not be the correct approach to improve second-eye outcome.
Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery during the preceding 12 months was performed, from which 81 patients were recruited. The difference between postoperative refractive error and preoperative target refraction for both eyes was established. The relationship between pairs of eyes was analyzed.
The difference from target refraction and postoperative refractive error was statistically significantly correlated between pairs of eyes (t=3.02; P=.003); however, only 10% of the variability in the difference from target refraction for the second eye could be accounted for by the first eye. Even if only the direction of this difference was considered (more myopic or hypermetropic than target refraction), there was concordance between pairs of eyes 63% of the time. This relationship was not modified by age, sex, keratometry, biometry (anterior chamber depth or axial length), or IOL type.
The data suggest that each eye of an individual patient be considered independently when selecting IOL power as part of cataract surgery.
研究双眼的屈光结果之间的关系。先前的证据表明,在白内障手术后根据第一只眼的屈光结果来改变第二只眼的人工晶状体(IOL)功率可能不是改善第二只眼结果的正确方法。
对过去 12 个月内接受双眼白内障手术的患者进行了回顾性图表审查,共招募了 81 名患者。确定了双眼术后屈光误差与术前目标屈光的差异。分析了双眼之间的关系。
双眼之间的目标屈光度差异与术后屈光误差呈统计学显著相关(t=3.02;P=.003);然而,第二只眼的目标屈光度差异的可变性只有 10%可以用第一只眼来解释。即使只考虑这种差异的方向(比目标屈光度更近视或远视),双眼之间也有 63%的时间是一致的。这种关系不受年龄、性别、角膜曲率、生物测量(前房深度或眼轴)或 IOL 类型的影响。
数据表明,在选择白内障手术中 IOL 功率时,应独立考虑每个患者的每只眼睛。