• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体反应风格的稳定性。

The stability of individual response styles.

机构信息

Department of Marketing, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Reep 1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychol Methods. 2010 Mar;15(1):96-110. doi: 10.1037/a0018721.

DOI:10.1037/a0018721
PMID:20230106
Abstract

Modeling capabilities for longitudinal data have progressed considerably, but questions remain on the extent to which method bias may negatively affect the validity of longitudinal survey data. The current study addresses the stability of individual response styles. We set up a longitudinal data collection in which the same respondents filled out 2 online questionnaires with nonoverlapping sets of heterogeneous items. Between data collections, there was a 1-year time gap. We simultaneously modeled 4 response styles that capture the major directional biases in questionnaire responses: acquiescence, disacquiescence, midpoint, and extreme response style. Drawing from latent state-trait theory, we specified a 2nd-order factor model with time-invariant and time-specific response style factors and a specifically designed covariance structure for the residual terms. The results indicate that response styles have an important stable component, a small part of which can be explained by demographics. The meaning and implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

纵向数据的建模能力有了显著的进步,但方法偏差在多大程度上可能会对纵向调查数据的有效性产生负面影响仍存在疑问。本研究解决了个体反应风格的稳定性问题。我们建立了一个纵向数据收集,相同的受访者填写了 2 个在线问卷,其中包含不重叠的异质项目集。在数据收集之间,有 1 年的时间间隔。我们同时对 4 种反应风格进行建模,这些风格捕捉了问卷反应中的主要定向偏差:默许、不同意、中点和极端反应风格。借鉴潜在状态-特质理论,我们指定了一个二阶因子模型,其中包括时间不变和时间特定的反应风格因子,以及为残差项专门设计的协方差结构。结果表明,反应风格有一个重要的稳定组成部分,其中一小部分可以用人口统计学来解释。这些发现的意义和影响将被讨论。

相似文献

1
The stability of individual response styles.个体反应风格的稳定性。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Mar;15(1):96-110. doi: 10.1037/a0018721.
2
The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.极端反应风格与默认反应在8年时间内的稳定性。
Assessment. 2016 Jun;23(3):279-91. doi: 10.1177/1073191115583714. Epub 2015 May 18.
3
On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006).关于CT-C(M-1)模型中潜在变量的意义:对梅德乌-奥利瓦雷斯和科夫曼(2006年)的评论
Psychol Methods. 2008 Mar;13(1):49-57. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.49.
4
Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.运用验证性因素分析和项目反应理论检测项目功能差异:迈向统一策略
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1292-306. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292.
5
Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models.分析状态与特质的收敛效度和区分效度:多方法潜在状态-特质模型的发展与应用
Psychol Assess. 2008 Sep;20(3):270-80. doi: 10.1037/a0012812.
6
Case matching and the reduction of selection bias in quasi-experiments: The relative importance of pretest measures of outcome, of unreliable measurement, and of mode of data analysis.病例匹配与准实验中选择偏差的减少:结局的预测试量、不可靠测量和数据分析模式的相对重要性。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Mar;15(1):56-68. doi: 10.1037/a0018536.
7
[French version of TASTE (test for the ability and evaluation)].[TASTE(能力与评估测试)的法语版本]
Encephale. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):527-38.
8
A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology.心理计量学与认知心理学界面的默许新模式。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):633-654. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1469966. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
An empirical study into the theory of unidimensional unfolding.单维展开理论的实证研究。
J Appl Meas. 2006;7(4):369-93.
10
Nutrition communication styles of family doctors: results of quantitative research.家庭医生的营养沟通方式:定量研究结果
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59 Suppl 1:S47-55; discussion S56. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602174.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual-Level Cultural Factors and Use of Survey Response Styles among Latino Survey Respondents.拉丁裔调查受访者的个人层面文化因素与调查回答方式的使用情况
Hisp J Behav Sci. 2022 Aug;44(3):216-242. doi: 10.1177/07399863231183023. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
"What If Applicants Fake Their Responses?": Modeling Faking and Response Styles in High-Stakes Assessments Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.“如果申请人伪造他们的回答会怎样?”:使用多维名义反应模型对高风险评估中的伪造和反应风格进行建模。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 23:00131644241307560. doi: 10.1177/00131644241307560.
3
A solution to the pervasive problem of response bias in self-reports.
自我报告中普遍存在的反应偏差问题的一种解决方案。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 21;122(3):e2412807122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412807122. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
4
Exploring the Influence of Response Styles on Continuous Scale Assessments: Insights From a Novel Modeling Approach.探索反应方式对连续量表评估的影响:来自一种新型建模方法的见解。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Feb;85(1):178-214. doi: 10.1177/00131644241242789. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
Gender rating gap in online reviews.在线评论中的性别评分差距。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar;9(3):507-520. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02003-6. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
6
Separation of Traits and Extreme Response Style in IRTree Models: The Role of Mimicry Effects for the Meaningful Interpretation of Estimates.IRTree模型中特质与极端反应风格的分离:模仿效应在估计值有意义解释中的作用。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):927-956. doi: 10.1177/00131644231213319. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
7
Investigating Directional Invariance in an Item Response Tree Model for Extreme Response Style and Trait-Based Unfolding Responses.探究极端反应风格和基于特质的展开式反应的项目反应树模型中的方向不变性。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Jul;48(4-5):187-207. doi: 10.1177/01466216241261705. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
8
Reply to: Differences in response-scale usage are ubiquitous in cross-country comparisons and a potential driver of elusive relationships.回复:在跨国比较中,反应量表使用的差异普遍存在,并且是难以捉摸的关系的一个潜在驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60468-x.
9
Psychometric benefits of self-chosen rating scales over given rating scales.自选评分量表优于给定评分量表的心理测量效益。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7440-7464. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02429-w. Epub 2024 May 6.
10
Dynamic Response Strategies: Accounting for Response Process Heterogeneity in IRTree Decision Nodes.动态响应策略:IRTree 决策节点中响应过程异质性的考虑。
Psychometrika. 2023 Dec;88(4):1354-1380. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09901-0. Epub 2023 Feb 6.