Cortese Bernardo, Limbruno Ugo
Interventional Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Future Cardiol. 2010 Mar;6(2):221-30. doi: 10.2217/fca.09.63.
Coronary bifurcation management is still a long way from an optimal solution with the current technologies. The long-lasting battle between the two-stent and provisional stenting strategies seems to have chosen the latter as winner, at least in most cases. However, with regard to other lesion subsets, interventions are often longer, more complex and charged with a worse outcome at both short- and medium-term follow-up. In the last decade, many dedicated devices have been developed to specifically address this condition. As in many similar cases, scientific commitment has returned few results, with these devices often being complex, time wasting and lacking evidence-based medicine. Here, we review the main technical features of this stent class and all the scientific data available.
冠状动脉分叉病变的处理,目前的技术距离最优解决方案仍有很长的路要走。双支架策略和临时支架策略之间持久的较量似乎已选定后者为胜者,至少在大多数情况下是这样。然而,对于其他病变亚组,干预往往耗时更长、更复杂,并且在短期和中期随访中预后更差。在过去十年中,已经研发了许多专门用于解决这种情况的器械。与许多类似情况一样,科学研究的成果寥寥,这些器械往往操作复杂、耗时,且缺乏循证医学依据。在此,我们回顾这类支架的主要技术特点以及所有可得的科学数据。