Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Nov 15;78(4):1026-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.036. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
To determine the effect of prophylactic gastrostomy tube (GT) placement on acute and long-term outcome for patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.
One hundred twenty consecutive patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy for Stage III/IV head and neck cancer to a median dose of 70 Gy (range, 64-74 Gy). The most common primary site was the oropharynx (66 patients). Sixty-seven patients (56%) were treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Seventy patients (58%) received prophylactic GT placement at the discretion of the physician before initiation of chemoradiotherapy.
Prophylactic GT placement significantly reduced weight loss during radiation therapy from 43 pounds (range, 0 to 76 pounds) to 19 pounds (range, 0 to 51 pounds), which corresponded to a net change of -14% (range, 0% to -30%) and -8% (range, +1% to -22%) from baseline, respectively (p < 0.001). However, the proportion of patients who were GT-dependent at 6- and 12-months after treatment was 41% and 21%, respectively, compared with 8% and 0%, respectively, for those with and without prophylactic GT (p < 0.001). Additionally, prophylactic GT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of late esophageal stricture compared with those who did not have prophylactic GT (30% vs. 6%, p < 0.001).
Although prophylactic GT placement was effective at preventing acute weight loss and the need for intravenous hydration, it was also associated with significantly higher rates of late esophageal toxicity. The benefits of this strategy must be balanced with the risks.
确定预防性胃造口管(GT)放置对接受根治性放化疗的局部晚期头颈部癌症患者的急性和长期结果的影响。
120 例连续接受放化疗的 III/IV 期头颈部癌症患者中位剂量为 70 Gy(范围 64-74 Gy)。最常见的原发部位是口咽(66 例)。67 例(56%)患者接受调强放疗(IMRT)治疗。70 例(58%)患者在开始放化疗前根据医生的判断预防性放置 GT。
预防性 GT 放置显著减少了放疗期间的体重减轻,从 43 磅(范围 0-76 磅)减少到 19 磅(范围 0-51 磅),相应的净变化分别为-14%(范围 0%-30%)和-8%(范围 1%-22%)从基线开始(p<0.001)。然而,治疗后 6 个月和 12 个月依赖 GT 的患者比例分别为 41%和 21%,而预防性 GT 患者分别为 8%和 0%(p<0.001)。此外,预防性 GT 与未预防性 GT 相比,发生晚期食管狭窄的发生率显著更高(30% vs. 6%,p<0.001)。
尽管预防性 GT 放置有效预防了急性体重减轻和静脉补液的需要,但也与显著更高的晚期食管毒性发生率相关。这种策略的好处必须与风险相平衡。