Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Feb;69(2):179-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03567.x.
The pathophysiology of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)-induced angio-oedema remains unclear. We have investigated the impact of ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in combination with serum ACE activity as well as the bradykinin B2 receptor 2/3 and c.C181T polymorphisms.
We analysed the ACE I/D as well as bradykinin B2 (2/3 and C181T) receptor polymorphisms in 65 patients with documented episodes of ACEi-induced angio-oedema and 65 patients matched for age and sex being under ACEi treatment without history of angio-oedema. Furthermore, we determined serum ACE activity in 47 of the 65 angio-oedema patients 3 months after the angio-oedema attack and compared these values with 51 healthy individuals (control II).
No risk association was identified between ACE I/D (I-allele: 0.42 vs. 0.41, D-allele: 0.58 vs. 0.59; P= 0.095) or bradykinin B2 receptor polymorphisms and the development of angio-oedema during ACEi treatment. We found a trend of lower serum ACE activity in ACE I/I genotypes in comparison with control II (I/I: 28 +/- 4.5 vs. 33 +/- 1.8 U l(-1); ID: 39 +/- 3.3 vs. 41 +/- 1 U l(-1); DD: 56 +/- 6.7 vs. 52 +/- 1.8 U l(-1); P= 0.9).
Our data suggest that polymorphism of ACE I/D and the bradykinin B2 receptor polymorphisms are not involved in the development of ACEi-induced angio-oedema when considered individually. Further studies should be carried out to clarify whether a combination of these polymorphisms might be a risk factor for ACEi-induced angio-oedema.
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)引起的血管性水肿的病理生理学仍不清楚。我们研究了 ACE 插入/缺失(I/D)多态性与血清 ACE 活性以及缓激肽 B2 受体 2/3 和 c.C181T 多态性的联合影响。
我们分析了 65 例有记录的 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿发作的患者以及 65 例年龄和性别匹配的 ACEI 治疗中无血管性水肿病史的患者的 ACE I/D 以及缓激肽 B2(2/3 和 C181T)受体多态性。此外,我们在血管性水肿发作后 3 个月测定了 65 例血管性水肿患者中的 47 例血清 ACE 活性,并将这些值与 51 名健康个体(对照 II)进行比较。
ACE I/D(I-等位基因:0.42 对 0.41,D-等位基因:0.58 对 0.59;P=0.095)或缓激肽 B2 受体多态性与 ACEI 治疗期间血管性水肿的发生之间没有发现风险关联。与对照 II 相比,我们发现 ACE I/I 基因型的血清 ACE 活性较低(I/I:28 +/- 4.5 对 33 +/- 1.8 U l(-1);ID:39 +/- 3.3 对 41 +/- 1 U l(-1);DD:56 +/- 6.7 对 52 +/- 1.8 U l(-1);P=0.9)。
我们的数据表明,ACE I/D 多态性和缓激肽 B2 受体多态性单独考虑时,与 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿的发生无关。应进行进一步的研究,以阐明这些多态性的组合是否是 ACEI 诱导的血管性水肿的危险因素。