• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向雇主营销抑郁护理管理:一项随机对照试验的设计。

Marketing depression care management to employers: design of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2010 Mar 16;5:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-22.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-5-22
PMID:20233448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2845549/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials demonstrate that depression care management can improve clinical and work outcomes sufficiently for selected employers to realize a return on investment. Employers can now purchase depression products that provide depression care management, defined as employee screening, education, monitoring, and clinician feedback for all depressed employees. We developed an intervention to encourage employers to purchase a depression product that offers the type, intensity, and duration of care management shown to improve clinical and work outcomes.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial conducted with 360 employers of 30 regional business coalitions, the research team proposes to compare the impact of a value-based marketing intervention to usual-care marketing on employer purchase of depression products. The study will also identify mediators and organizational-level moderators of intervention impact. Employers randomized to the value-based condition receive a presentation encouraging them to purchase depression products scientifically shown to benefit the employee and the employer. Employers randomized to the usual-care condition receive a presentation encouraging them to monitor and improve quality indicators for outpatient depression treatment. Because previous research demonstrates that the usual-care intervention will have little to no impact on employer purchasing, depression product purchasing rates in the usual-care condition capture vendor efforts to market depression products to employers in both conditions while the value-based intervention is being conducted. Employers in both conditions are also provided free technical assistance to undertake the actions each presentation encourages. The research team will use intent-to-treat models of all available data to evaluate intervention impact on the purchase of depression products using a cumulative incidence analysis of 12- and 24-month data.

DISCUSSION

By addressing the 'value to whom?' question, the study advances knowledge about one of the most pivotal problems in the translation of evidence-based care to 'real world' settings: whether purchasers can be influenced to buy healthcare products on the basis of value and not exclusively on the basis of cost. If value-based marketing increases depression product purchase rates over usual care, this study will provide encouragement to market new healthcare products on the basis of the product's value to the purchaser as well as the recipient of care.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01013220.

摘要

背景

随机试验表明,抑郁护理管理可以充分改善临床和工作结果,使选定的雇主能够获得投资回报。雇主现在可以购买提供抑郁护理管理的抑郁产品,即对所有抑郁员工进行员工筛查、教育、监测和临床医生反馈。我们开发了一种干预措施,鼓励雇主购买一种提供经证明可改善临床和工作结果的护理管理类型、强度和持续时间的抑郁产品。

方法

在一项针对 30 个地区商业联盟的 360 名雇主的随机对照试验中,研究小组旨在比较基于价值的营销干预与常规护理营销对雇主购买抑郁产品的影响。该研究还将确定干预影响的中介因素和组织层面的调节因素。随机分配到基于价值条件的雇主将收到一份演示文稿,鼓励他们购买经科学证明对员工和雇主有益的抑郁产品。随机分配到常规护理条件的雇主将收到一份演示文稿,鼓励他们监测和改善门诊抑郁症治疗的质量指标。由于先前的研究表明常规护理干预对雇主购买几乎没有影响,因此在进行基于价值的干预的同时,常规护理条件下的抑郁产品购买率将捕捉供应商向两种条件下的雇主营销抑郁产品的努力。两种情况下的雇主还将获得免费的技术援助,以采取每个演示文稿鼓励的行动。研究小组将使用所有可用数据的意向治疗模型,通过 12 个月和 24 个月数据的累积发生率分析,评估干预对抑郁产品购买的影响。

讨论

通过解决“对谁有价值?”问题,该研究推进了关于将循证护理转化为“现实世界”环境的最关键问题之一的知识:购买者是否可以基于价值而不仅仅是基于成本来购买医疗保健产品。如果基于价值的营销提高了常规护理的抑郁产品购买率,那么这项研究将鼓励根据产品对购买者以及护理接受者的价值来推销新的医疗保健产品。

临床试验注册号

NCT01013220。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ec/2845549/e000ab030901/1748-5908-5-22-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ec/2845549/e000ab030901/1748-5908-5-22-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ec/2845549/e000ab030901/1748-5908-5-22-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Marketing depression care management to employers: design of a randomized controlled trial.向雇主营销抑郁护理管理:一项随机对照试验的设计。
Implement Sci. 2010 Mar 16;5:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-22.
2
Intervention impact on depression product appraisal and purchasing behavior by employers: a randomized trial.干预措施对雇主的抑郁症产品评估及购买行为的影响:一项随机试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 24;14:426. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-426.
3
Employers' use of value-based purchasing strategies.雇主对基于价值的采购策略的运用。
JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2281-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2281.
4
The effect of improving primary care depression management on employee absenteeism and productivity. A randomized trial.改善基层医疗中抑郁症管理对员工缺勤率和生产力的影响。一项随机试验。
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1202-10. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00007.
5
The costs and benefits of enhanced depression care to employers.加强抑郁症护理对雇主的成本与收益。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;63(12):1345-53. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1345.
6
Modeling the impact of enhanced depression treatment on workplace functioning and costs: a cost-benefit approach.模拟强化抑郁症治疗对工作场所功能和成本的影响:一种成本效益方法。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):352-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204049.30620.1e.
7
Do employers know the quality of health care benefits they provide? Use of HEDIS depression scores for health plans.雇主了解他们提供的医疗保健福利的质量吗?使用 HEDIS 抑郁评分来评估健康计划。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1;64(11):1134-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200534.
8
Design of a randomized controlled trial on the effects of counseling of mental health problems by occupational physicians on return to work: the CO-OP-study.职业医生对心理健康问题进行咨询对重返工作岗位影响的随机对照试验设计:CO-OP研究
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 26;7:183. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-183.
9
Impact of primary care depression intervention on employment and workplace conflict outcomes: is value added?初级保健抑郁症干预对就业和工作场所冲突结果的影响:是否增加了价值?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2002 Mar;5(1):43-9.
10
Making the business case for enhanced depression care: the National Institute of Mental Health-harvard Work Outcomes Research and Cost-effectiveness Study.阐述加强抑郁症护理的商业理由:美国国立精神卫生研究所-哈佛工作成果研究与成本效益研究
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;50(4):468-75. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31816a8931.

引用本文的文献

1
Work productivity loss from depression: evidence from an employer survey.抑郁症导致的工作效率损失:来自雇主调查的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 18;14:597. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0597-y.
2
Intervention impact on depression product appraisal and purchasing behavior by employers: a randomized trial.干预措施对雇主的抑郁症产品评估及购买行为的影响:一项随机试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 24;14:426. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-426.
3
Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders.促进患有适应障碍的成年人重返工作岗位的干预措施。

本文引用的文献

1
Employer burden of mild, moderate, and severe major depressive disorder: mental health services utilization and costs, and work performance.雇主承担轻度、中度和重度重度抑郁症的负担:精神卫生服务的利用和成本,以及工作表现。
Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(1):78-89. doi: 10.1002/da.20580.
2
Improving medication management of depression in health plans.改善健康计划中抑郁症的药物管理。
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jan;59(1):72-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.1.72.
3
Employers' use of value-based purchasing strategies.雇主对基于价值的采购策略的运用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD006389. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2.
JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2281-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2281.
4
Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.针对抑郁员工的电话筛查、外展服务及护理管理及其对临床和工作生产力结果的影响:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.12.1401.
5
Depression and work impairment.抑郁症与工作能力受损。
Health Rep. 2007 Feb;18(1):9-22.
6
Prevalence and effects of mood disorders on work performance in a nationally representative sample of U.S. workers.美国劳动者全国代表性样本中情绪障碍的患病率及其对工作表现的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;163(9):1561-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.9.1561.
7
Modeling the impact of enhanced depression treatment on workplace functioning and costs: a cost-benefit approach.模拟强化抑郁症治疗对工作场所功能和成本的影响:一种成本效益方法。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):352-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204049.30620.1e.
8
Are employers pursuing value-based purchasing?雇主们在追求基于价值的采购吗?
Benefits Q. 2005;21(3):20-9.
9
The effect of improving primary care depression management on employee absenteeism and productivity. A randomized trial.改善基层医疗中抑郁症管理对员工缺勤率和生产力的影响。一项随机试验。
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1202-10. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00007.
10
Effects of major depression on moment-in-time work performance.重度抑郁症对即时工作表现的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;161(10):1885-91. doi: 10.1176/ajp.161.10.1885.