Rao Hygriv B, Krishnaswami Raghu, Kalavakolanu Sharada, Calambur Narasimhan
CARE Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Mar 5;10(3):115-21.
Assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure is used for selecting candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The patterns of regional distribution of dyssynchrony in a population with LBBB with and without heart failure have not been well delineated. This aspect forms the object of the study.
Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) data of consecutive patients with heart failure and LBBB (Group A) was compared with those with LBBB and normal LV function (Group B). All patients had standard 2D-echocardigraphic examination and TDI. Tissue velocity curves obtained by placing sample volumes in opposing basal and mid segments of septal, lateral, inferior, anterior and posterior walls were analyzed. Inter ventricular dyssynchrony (IVD) was assessed by the difference between aortic and pulmonary pre ejection intervals. LV dyssynchrony (LVD) was assessed by the difference in times to peak velocity. A delay of >/= 40 msec was considered significant for presence of IVD and LVD.
There were 103 patients in Group A and 25 in Group B. The mean QRS duration and PR intervals respectively were 146 +/- 25 vs. 152+/-20 msec and 182+/- 47 vs. 165+/-36 msec. (p=NS) LVEF in the 2 groups were (32 +/- 6 % vs. 61+/- 11%; p< 0.01). Prevalence of dyssynchrony in the HF group compared to Group B was 72% vs. 16%, (P< 0.01). Lateral wall dyssynchrony in the 2 groups was 37% vs. 0% (p< 0.01) while septal dyssynchrony was 16% vs. 16% (p- NS).
72% of heart failure patients with LBBB have documented dyssynchrony on TDI, which has a heterogeneous regional distribution. Dyssynchrony may be seen in LBBB and normal hearts but it is does not involve the lateral wall. Septal dyssynchrony in heart failure patients may not have the same significance as lateral wall delay.
评估心力衰竭患者的心室不同步性用于筛选心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的候选者。左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)伴或不伴心力衰竭人群中不同步性的区域分布模式尚未得到很好的描述。这方面构成了本研究的对象。
将连续的心力衰竭合并LBBB患者(A组)的组织多普勒成像(TDI)数据与LBBB且左心室功能正常的患者(B组)的数据进行比较。所有患者均进行了标准的二维超声心动图检查和TDI检查。分析通过将取样容积置于间隔、侧壁、下壁、前壁和后壁相对的基底段和中间段所获得的组织速度曲线。通过主动脉和肺动脉射血前期的差异评估心室间不同步性(IVD)。通过峰值速度时间的差异评估左心室不同步性(LVD)。IVD和LVD存在时,延迟≥40毫秒被认为具有显著性。
A组有103例患者,B组有25例患者。平均QRS时限和PR间期分别为146±25毫秒对152±20毫秒以及182±47毫秒对165±36毫秒。(p=无显著性差异)两组的左心室射血分数(LVEF)分别为(32±6%对61±11%;p<0.01)。与B组相比,心力衰竭组不同步性的患病率为72%对16%,(P<0.01)。两组的侧壁不同步性分别为37%对0%(p<0.01),而间隔不同步性分别为16%对16%(p=无显著性差异)。
72%的LBBB心力衰竭患者经TDI证实存在不同步性,其区域分布不均一。LBBB和正常心脏中均可出现不同步性,但不涉及侧壁。心力衰竭患者的间隔不同步性可能与侧壁延迟具有不同的意义。