Graduate Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Glob Public Health. 2011;6(2):111-24. doi: 10.1080/17441690903575255.
Within the array of measures for improving medicines access for the world's neediest populations, governments of many countries have turned to compulsory licensing, a statutory mechanism to enable third parties to manufacture a product or process still under patent. In this paper, we focus on a historic case example from Canada and the present example of Thailand's use of domestic compulsory licenses as a policy tool for ensuring public access to affordable medicines. The overarching objective is to draw out policy and legislative insights that may be of value for countries with pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity and which are considering better access to patented medicines for their populations under the current global intellectual property regime. From these cases, it is apparent that although compulsory licensing is not a novel remedy, even in a post-Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights environment, it remains a powerful policy tool in improving access to medicines in a variety of domestic settings.
在为世界上最贫困人群改善药品可及性的一系列措施中,许多国家的政府都转向了强制许可,这是一种法定机制,使第三方能够制造仍受专利保护的产品或工艺。在本文中,我们重点关注加拿大的一个历史性案例和泰国目前利用国内强制许可作为确保公众获得负担得起的药品的政策工具的案例。主要目的是得出对具有制药能力并正在考虑在当前全球知识产权制度下为其人民更好地获得专利药品的国家具有价值的政策和立法见解。从这些案例中可以明显看出,尽管强制许可不是一种新的补救措施,即使在《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》之后的环境中,它仍然是在各种国内环境中改善药品可及性的有力政策工具。