Zafar S Yousuf, Marcello Jennifer E, Wheeler Jane L, Rowe Krista L, Morse Michael A, Herndon James E, Abernethy Amy P
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite G05, Hock Plaza, DUMC Box 2732, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Support Oncol. 2010 Jan-Feb;8(1):15-20.
As survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) increases, patients have more exposure to chemotherapy and related toxicity. The objective is to determine how toxicity patterns affect care. Via a population-based strategy, mCRC cases diagnosed between June 2003 and June 2006 were identified from one academic and nine community oncology practices in the southeastern United States. Demographic, disease, treatment, hospitalization, and toxicity data were abstracted by retrospective chart review, double-entered, and verified for accuracy. Of the 738 charts screened, 110 were eligible based upon preidentified inclusion criteria. As part of first-line chemotherapy, 87% received oxaliplatin, 12% received irinotecan, and 74% received bevacizumab. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the most common toxicity-related cause of drug discontinuation (16 of 61 events) and hospitalization (19 of 54 events). Both neurologic and hematologic toxicities were identified more frequently when oxaliplatin-containing regimens were administered (50% and 48%, respectively) than with irinotecan-containing regimens (10% and 24%, respectively). Dose reduction was most commonly associated with hematologic toxicity (22 of 55 events). Oxaliplatin and irinotecan required similar rates of antidiarrheal, antinausea, erythropoiesis-stimulating, and granulocyte-stimulating treatments. These data, obtained from a usual-practice setting, provide benchmarks to improve clinical practice.
随着转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者生存率的提高,患者接触化疗及相关毒性的情况增多。目的是确定毒性模式如何影响治疗。通过基于人群的策略,从美国东南部的一家学术肿瘤中心和九家社区肿瘤诊所中识别出2003年6月至2006年6月期间诊断的mCRC病例。通过回顾性病历审查提取人口统计学、疾病、治疗、住院和毒性数据,进行双录入并核实准确性。在筛查的738份病历中,根据预先确定的纳入标准,有110份符合条件。作为一线化疗的一部分,87%的患者接受了奥沙利铂,12%接受了伊立替康,74%接受了贝伐单抗。胃肠道毒性是与药物停用(61例事件中的16例)和住院(54例事件中的19例)相关的最常见毒性原因。与含伊立替康的方案(分别为10%和24%)相比,使用含奥沙利铂的方案时,神经毒性和血液学毒性的识别频率更高(分别为50%和48%)。剂量减少最常与血液学毒性相关(55例事件中的22例)。奥沙利铂和伊立替康所需的止泻、止吐、促红细胞生成和粒细胞刺激治疗率相似。这些从常规实践环境中获得的数据为改善临床实践提供了基准。